Cited by 71Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Mild Emphysema Is Associated with Reduced Elastic Recoil and Increased Lung Size but Not with Air-Flow Limitation

Petty, Thomas L., Silvers, G. Wayne, Stanford, Ray E.·1987·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Thirty-nine excised human lungs were examined to identify early changes in the small airways, their size distribution, and their elastic recoil in relation to mild degrees of emphysema. Elastic recoil measurements, single-breath nitrogen (SBN2) tests, and FEV1 were obtained from 18 lungs with no emphysema and 21 emphysematous lungs with no greater than Grade 5 emphysema score. The mean number of alveolar attachments per bronchiole was determined from all the bronchioles cut in cross section. When the 2 groups of lungs were compared, the percentage of predicted elastic recoil of the nonemphysematous lungs was significantly greater at 50, 70, 80, and 90% of TLC than in the mildly emphysematous lungs. The TLC of the emphysematous lungs (% of predicted) was also significantly greater than in the nonemphysematous lungs. Pigment of the small airways was the only pathologic feature that was significantly greater in the emphysematous lungs than in the nonemphysematous lungs. Size distribution in the small airways was similar except for the airways zero to 0.2 mm, which were more frequent in the emphysematous lungs. When data from both groups were combined, elastic recoil was shown to be related to both the number of alveolar attachments (p < 0.03) and the mean diameter of the small airways (p < 0.01). We conclude that structural and functional changes in lungs with mild emphysema include reduced elastic recoil, increased lung size, and some size distribution changes in the small airways. Mild emphysema is not associated with air-flow limitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/136.4.867

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 1980, Respir Dis, 122, 265
  2. 1965, Am Rev Respir Dis, 93, 450
  3. 1971, Respir Dis, 103, 56
  4. 1980, Physiol, 49, 558
  5. 1960, Am Rev Respir Dis, 81, 938

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petty, T. L., Silvers, G. W., & Stanford, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1987-10-01
Volume
136
Issue
4
Pages
867-871
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075475901
Cited by
71
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Review of Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
elastic recoil, lung size, total lung capacity, small airways, bronchioles
MeSH terms
Airway Resistance, Female, Humans, Lung, Lung Compliance, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Pulmonary Alveoli, Pulmonary Emphysema, Smoking, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review