The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Use of the Internal Perimeter to Compare Airway Size and to Calculate Smooth Muscle Shortening
Abstract
Previous studies from our laboratory suggest that the internal airway perimeter (Pi) defined by the folded epithelial surface remains constant as the airways narrow. To test this hypothesis, we treated adjacent slices of resected lung lobes with either theophylline or carbachol and determined the dimensions of the airways in these lung slices. Transverse sections of contracted (n = 58) and relaxed (n = 55) airways were used to measure the Pi defined by the epithelial surface, lumen area (Ai), external perimeter (Pe) defined by the outer edge of the smooth muscle layer, and the external area (Ae). Wall area (WA = Ae - Ai) was calculated. The frequency distribution of internal perimeters was not significantly different for the contracted and relaxed airways, and when the square root of wall area was plotted against Pi, the regression lines for the contracted and relaxed airways were almost identical. The "relaxed" external perimeter was calculated Per = square root Pi2 + (4 pi WA), and the percentage of muscle shortening (PMS) was determined: PMS = [(Per - Pe)/Per] x 100. We conclude that Pi and WA are constant in airways whether the smooth muscle is relaxed or contracted and that Pi can be used as a marker of airway size and, under controlled conditions, can be used to calculate the smooth muscle shortening present in a given airway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From structure to disease: the evolving tale of aquaporin biology
King, L. S., Kozono, D., & Agre, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1469 · Cited by 887
The Structure of Large and Small Airways in Nonfatal and Fatal Asthma
Carroll, N., Elliot, J., Morton, A., & James, A. (1993) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/147.2.405 · Cited by 720
Self-citationA Model of Airway Narrowing in Asthma and in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Wiggs, B. R., Bosken, C., Paré, P. D., James, A., & Hogg, J. C. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1251 · Cited by 443
Self-citationSex Differences in Severe Pulmonary Emphysema
Martinez, F. J., Curtis, J. L., Sciurba, F., Mumford, J., Giardino, N. D., Weinmann, G., Kazerooni, E., Murray, S., Criner, G. J., Sin, D. D., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200606-828oc · Cited by 365
Self-citationSAETTA, M., TURATO, G., BARALDO, S., ZANIN, A., BRACCIONI, F., MAPP, C. E., MAESTRELLI, P., CAVALLESCO, G., PAPI, A., & FABBRI, L. M. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9907080 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- James, A. L., Hogg, J. C., Dunn, L. A., & Paré, P. D.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 136-139
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070401283
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of the Internal Perimeter to Compare Airway Size and to Calculate Smooth Muscle Shortening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.136
- The paper
- James, A. L., Hogg, J. C., Dunn, L. A., & Paré, P. D. (1988). The Use of the Internal Perimeter to Compare Airway Size and to Calculate Smooth Muscle Shortening. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.