Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitation of Mast Cells and Eosinophils in the Bronchial Mucosa of Symptomatic Atopic Asthmatics and Healthy Control Subjects Using Immunohistochemistry

Djukanović, Ratko, Wilson, John W., Britten, Karen M., Wilson, Susan J., Walls, Andrew F., Roche, William R., Howarth, Peter H., Holgate, Stephen T.·1990·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

We have used fiberoptic bronchoscopy to obtain endobronchial biopsies in which mast cells and eosinophils were enumerated using monoclonal antibodies directed against mast cell tryptase (AA1) and the eosinophil cationic protein (EG2). Eleven symptomatic atopic asthmatics treated with beta 2-agonists alone and six normal subjects were studied. Over a period of 2 wk prior to bronchoscopy, patients recorded asthma symptom scores, bronchodilator usage, and twice-daily peak expiratory flow. Five days before bronchoscopy, methacholine responsiveness was assessed. Two biopsies were taken from the subcarinae, one of which was processed into araldite for immunostaining by the streptavidin biotin immunoperoxidase method and the other into Spurr resin for electron microscopy. The number of AA1 staining mast cells present in the bronchial mucosa was not significantly different in the epithelium or submucosa between the asthmatic and the normal subjects. However, in the biopsies from asthmatics, there were significantly greater numbers of EG2-staining eosinophils in the epithelium (median, 1.2/mm versus zero; p less than 0.005) and in the submucosa (median, 50/mm2 versus 1/mm2; p less than 0.001). Electron microscopy showed morphologic features of mast cell and eosinophil degranulation in the asthmatics. No correlation could be established between mast cell or eosinophil numbers and indices of disease activity of PC20 methacholine, which points to the complexity of mechanisms responsible for the symptoms and the airway hyperresponsiveness of asthma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/142.4.863

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Djukanović, R., Wilson, J. W., Britten, K. M., Wilson, S. J., Walls, A. F., Roche, W. R., Howarth, P. H., & Holgate, S. T.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1990-10
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
863-871
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154945180
Cited by
462
References
25
FWCI
19.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of Mast Cells and Eosinophils in the Bronchial Mucosa of Symptomatic Atopic Asthmatics and Healthy Control Subjects Using Immunohistochemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/142.4.863
The paper
Djukanović, R., Wilson, J. W., Britten, K. M., Wilson, S. J., Walls, A. F., Roche, W. R., Howarth, P. H., & Holgate, S. T. (1990). Quantitation of Mast Cells and Eosinophils in the Bronchial Mucosa of Symptomatic Atopic Asthmatics and Healthy Control Subjects Using Immunohistochemistry. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/142.4.863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.