Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 873

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Activated T Lymphocytes and Eosinophils in Bronchial Biopsies in Stable Atopic Asthma

Azzawi, May, Bradley, Brian, Jeffery, Peter K., Frew, Anthony J., Wardlaw, Andrew J., Knowles, Geoffrey, Assoufi, Basil, Collins, John V., Durham, Stephen, Kay, A. Barry·1990·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Abstract We have used immunohistochemistry and monoclonal antibodies to analyze the phenotypic composition and activation status of the cellular infiltrate of bronchial biopsies obtained by fiber optic bronchoscopy of 11 atopic asthmatic subjects (FEV1 % predicted range 78 to 114), 9 atopic nonasthmatic control subjects, and 10 normal healthy subjects. Examination of mucosal biopsies obtained from both central (level I) and subsegmental (level II) bronchi showed that the highest number of CD45-, DC3-, DC4-, and CD8-positive cells were found in the group with asthma. There was a significant increase in the number of interleukin-2 receptor (CD25)-positive cells (a marker of lymphocyte activation) at airway level I in the asthmatic group compared with both nonasthmatic atopic (p < 0.05) and normal control subjects (p < 0.01). Eosinophil numbers were significantly increased in asthma at both airway levels and at airway level II in the nonasthmatic atopic group when compared with normal healthy control subjects (p < 0.05). EG2-positive cells (an index of secretion of eosinophil cationic protein following activation) were found at both airway levels in the asthmatic group and at level I in the nonasthmatic atopic control group (p < 0.05). When asthmatic subjects were compared with normal healthy subjects, there was a reduction in the number of neutrophil elastase-positive cells in the asthmatic subjects which, as a percentage of leukocytes, was significant (p = 0.05). When normoresponsive subjects were compared with hyperresponsive subjects (PC20 < 8 mg/ml methacholine), the hyperresponsive subjects had a significantly higher percentage of CD25-positive cells at airway level I (p < 0.01) and of EG2-positive cells at levels I and II (p < 0.01). These results support the view that the recruitment and “activation” of lymphocytes and eosinophils are important in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_pt_1.1407

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 873

Metadata

Authors
Azzawi, M., Bradley, B., Jeffery, P. K., Frew, A. J., Wardlaw, A. J., Knowles, G., Assoufi, B., Collins, J. V., Durham, S., & Kay, A. B.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1990-12
Volume
142
Issue
6_pt_1
Pages
1407-1413
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116313488
Cited by
873
References
2
FWCI
33.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Activated T Lymphocytes and Eosinophils in Bronchial Biopsies in Stable Atopic Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_pt_1.1407
The paper
Azzawi, M., Bradley, B., Jeffery, P. K., Frew, A. J., Wardlaw, A. J., Knowles, G., Assoufi, B., Collins, J. V., Durham, S., & Kay, A. B. (1990). Identification of Activated T Lymphocytes and Eosinophils in Bronchial Biopsies in Stable Atopic Asthma. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_pt_1.1407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.