Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective Study of Nosocomial Pneumonia and of Patient and Circuit Colonization During Mechanical Ventilation with Circuit Changes Every 48 Hours Versus No Change

Dreyfuss, Didier, Djedaini, Kamel, Weber, Philippe, Brun, Patrick, Lanore, Jean-Jacques, Rahmani, Jamil, Boussougant, Yves, Coste, FrançOis·1991·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Abstract Circuits on mechanical ventilators with cascade humidifiers are routinely changed every day or every other day, although humidifying cascades have been considered unlikely to increase the risk of respiratory infection because they do not generate aerosols. Moreover, changing ventilator tubings every 24 rather than every 48 h increases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. To study the effects of ventilator circuit changes on the rate of nosocomial pneumonia and on patient and circuit colonization, 73 consecutive patients requiring continuous mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h were randomly assigned to either ventilator circuit changes every 48 h (Group 1, n = 38) or no change (Group 2, n = 35). Patients dying or being weaned before 96 h were not analyzed (Group 1 n = 3; Group 2 n = 7; leaving Group 1 n = 35 and Group 2 n = 28; p = 0.13). Ventilator-associated pneumonia was defined as the occurrence during mechanical ventilation or within 48 h after weaning of a new and persistent infiltrate on chest X-ray, purulent tracheal secretions, and a positive culture of a protected brush specimen (⩾ 103 cfu/ml). Bacterial colonization was assessed every 48 h by quantitative cultures of pharyngeal swab, tracheal aspirate, humidifying cascade, and expiratory tubing trap. The two groups were similar in terms of age, indication for and duration of ventilation, and severity of illness. The incidence of pneumonia was similar in both groups (11 of 35 and 8 of 28 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.8), as was the duration of ventilation before pneumonia (10.1 ± 5.8 versus 9.1 ± 2.9 days; p = 0.7). The level of colonization by both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was the same in both groups. We conclude that not changing ventilator circuits during mechanical ventilation has no adverse effect on the rate of nosocomial pneumonia or on patient and circuit colonization. Substantial savings in expenses of tubing and personnel time could be obtained without apparent adverse effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_pt_1.738

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Dreyfuss, D., Djedaini, K., Weber, P., Brun, P., Lanore, J.-J., Rahmani, J., Boussougant, Y., & Coste, F.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1991-04
Volume
143
Issue
4_pt_1
Pages
738-743
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038114251
Cited by
237
References
1
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Study of Nosocomial Pneumonia and of Patient and Circuit Colonization During Mechanical Ventilation with Circuit Changes Every 48 Hours Versus No Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_pt_1.738
The paper
Dreyfuss, D., Djedaini, K., Weber, P., Brun, P., Lanore, J.-J., Rahmani, J., Boussougant, Y., & Coste, F. (1991). Prospective Study of Nosocomial Pneumonia and of Patient and Circuit Colonization During Mechanical Ventilation with Circuit Changes Every 48 Hours Versus No Change. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_pt_1.738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.