The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective Study of Nosocomial Pneumonia and of Patient and Circuit Colonization During Mechanical Ventilation with Circuit Changes Every 48 Hours Versus No Change
Abstract
Abstract Circuits on mechanical ventilators with cascade humidifiers are routinely changed every day or every other day, although humidifying cascades have been considered unlikely to increase the risk of respiratory infection because they do not generate aerosols. Moreover, changing ventilator tubings every 24 rather than every 48 h increases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. To study the effects of ventilator circuit changes on the rate of nosocomial pneumonia and on patient and circuit colonization, 73 consecutive patients requiring continuous mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h were randomly assigned to either ventilator circuit changes every 48 h (Group 1, n = 38) or no change (Group 2, n = 35). Patients dying or being weaned before 96 h were not analyzed (Group 1 n = 3; Group 2 n = 7; leaving Group 1 n = 35 and Group 2 n = 28; p = 0.13). Ventilator-associated pneumonia was defined as the occurrence during mechanical ventilation or within 48 h after weaning of a new and persistent infiltrate on chest X-ray, purulent tracheal secretions, and a positive culture of a protected brush specimen (⩾ 103 cfu/ml). Bacterial colonization was assessed every 48 h by quantitative cultures of pharyngeal swab, tracheal aspirate, humidifying cascade, and expiratory tubing trap. The two groups were similar in terms of age, indication for and duration of ventilation, and severity of illness. The incidence of pneumonia was similar in both groups (11 of 35 and 8 of 28 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.8), as was the duration of ventilation before pneumonia (10.1 ± 5.8 versus 9.1 ± 2.9 days; p = 0.7). The level of colonization by both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was the same in both groups. We conclude that not changing ventilator circuits during mechanical ventilation has no adverse effect on the rate of nosocomial pneumonia or on patient and circuit colonization. Substantial savings in expenses of tubing and personnel time could be obtained without apparent adverse effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changing Pharyngeal Bacterial Flora of Hospitalized Patients: Emergence of Gram-Negative Bacilli
Johanson, W. G., Pierce, A. K., & Sanford, J. P. (1969) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196911202812101 · Cited by 910
Cited by
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
RISK FACTORS FOR NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA
Fleming, C. A., Balaguera, H. U., & Craven, D. E. (2001) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70395-3 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Dreyfuss, D., Djedaini, K., Weber, P., Brun, P., Lanore, J.-J., Rahmani, J., Boussougant, Y., & Coste, F.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 4_pt_1
- Pages
- 738-743
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038114251
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Study of Nosocomial Pneumonia and of Patient and Circuit Colonization During Mechanical Ventilation with Circuit Changes Every 48 Hours Versus No Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_pt_1.738
- The paper
- Dreyfuss, D., Djedaini, K., Weber, P., Brun, P., Lanore, J.-J., Rahmani, J., Boussougant, Y., & Coste, F. (1991). Prospective Study of Nosocomial Pneumonia and of Patient and Circuit Colonization During Mechanical Ventilation with Circuit Changes Every 48 Hours Versus No Change. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/143.4_pt_1.738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.