Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulmonary Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Barnes, Peter J., Chowdhury, Badrul, Kharitonov, Sergei A., Magnussen, Helgo, Page, Clive P., Postma, Dirkje, Saetta, Marina·2006·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in using pulmonary biomarkers to understand and monitor the inflammation in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this Pulmonary Perspective we discuss the merits of the various approaches by reviewing the current literature on pulmonary biomarkers in COPD and underscore the need for more systematic studies in the future. Bronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage provide valuable information about inflammatory cells and mediators, but are invasive, so that repeated measurements have to be very limited in assessing any interventions. Induced sputum has provided considerable information about the inflammatory process, including mediators and proteinases in COPD, but selectively samples proximal airways and may not closely reflect distal inflammatory processes. Exhaled gases and breath condensate are noninvasive procedures, so repeated measurements are possible, but for some assays the variability is relatively high. There is relatively little information about how any of these biomarkers relate to other clinical outcomes, such as progression of the disease, severity of disease, clinical subtypes, or response to therapy. More information is also needed about the variability in these measurements. In the future, pulmonary biomarkers may be useful in predicting disease progression, indicating disease instability, and in predicting response to current therapies and novel therapies, many of which are now in development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200510-1659pp

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Barnes, P. J., Chowdhury, B., Kharitonov, S. A., Magnussen, H., Page, C. P., Postma, D., & Saetta, M.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pages
6-14
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2148749048
Cited by
298
References
4
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200510-1659pp
The paper
Barnes, P. J., Chowdhury, B., Kharitonov, S. A., Magnussen, H., Page, C. P., Postma, D., & Saetta, M. (2006). Pulmonary Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200510-1659pp

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.