Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effects of a Monoclonal Antibody Directed against Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Asthma

Erin, Edward M., Leaker, Brian R., Nicholson, Grant C., Tan, Andrew J., Green, Linda M., Neighbour, Helen, Zacharasiewicz, Angela S., Turner, Jackie, Barnathan, Elliot S., Kon, Onn Min, Barnes, Peter J., Hansel, Trevor T.·2006·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Neutralization of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is an effective antiinflammatory therapy for several chronic inflammatory diseases. METHODS AND OBJECTIVES: We undertook a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design study in 38 patients with moderate asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids but symptomatic during a run-in phase. Infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo was administered by intravenous infusion at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. We assessed clinical response by monitoring lung function, symptoms, and inhaled beta(2)-agonist usage using hand-held electronic devices. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, change in morning PEF at Days 50-56 compared with the last 7 d of the run-in, was not significantly different on treatment. However, infliximab was associated with a decrease in mean diurnal variation of PEF at Week 8 (p = 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.1 to -0.72). Furthermore, there was a decrease in the number of patients with exacerbations of asthma (p = 0.01; 95% CI, 4.4 to 52.7) and an increased probability of freedom from exacerbation with time (p = 0.03) in patients on infliximab (n = 14) compared with placebo (n = 18). In addition, infliximab decreased levels of TNF-alpha (p = 0.01) and other cytokines in sputum supernatants. There were no serious adverse events related to the study agent. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with infliximab was well tolerated and caused a decrease in the number of patients with exacerbations in symptomatic moderate asthma. The promising preliminary findings underscore the need to evaluate therapy directed against TNF-alpha in larger trials enrolling patients with more severe asthma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200601-072ocThis paper is marked retracted.

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Erin, E. M., Leaker, B. R., Nicholson, G. C., Tan, A. J., Green, L. M., Neighbour, H., Zacharasiewicz, A. S., Turner, J., Barnathan, E. S., Kon, O. M., Barnes, P. J., & Hansel, T. T.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
174
Issue
7
Pages
753-762
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2172037552
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
18.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of a Monoclonal Antibody Directed against Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200601-072oc
The paper
Erin, E. M., Leaker, B. R., Nicholson, G. C., Tan, A. J., Green, L. M., Neighbour, H., Zacharasiewicz, A. S., Turner, J., Barnathan, E. S., Kon, O. M., Barnes, P. J., & Hansel, T. T. (2006). The Effects of a Monoclonal Antibody Directed against Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200601-072oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.