Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fibroblast Foci Are Not Discrete Sites of Lung Injury or Repair: The Fibroblast Reticulum

Open access
Cool, Carlyne D., Groshong, Steve D., Rai, Pradeep R., Henson, Peter M., Stewart, J. Scott, Brown, Kevin K.·2006·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), the pathologic correlate of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, contains characteristic discrete areas of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and newly formed collagen, termed "fibroblast foci." These lesions are argued to represent isolated sites of recurrent acute lung injury and suggested to be the mechanism of disease progression. We hypothesized that, rather than isolated, these lesions are part of an organized neoplasm. METHODS: Morphometric analysis of pentachrome-stained histologic sections of UIP was performed. Using point-counting technique on serial sections, fibroblast foci, arteries, and macrophage clusters were identified and we determined their individual "connectiveness" by estimating the Euler number. Two-dimensional micrographs were collated into a three-dimensional array from which a visual three-dimensional reconstruction could be constructed. Clonality analysis was performed using human androgen receptor gene methylation assay. RESULTS: Blood vessels show significant connectivity with a Euler number of 2, whereas macrophage clusters exhibited no connectivity. The fibroblast foci showed a high level of interconnection with Euler numbers ranging from 19 to 39. The computer generated three-dimensional models provide a visual confirmation of this connectiveness. Human androgen receptor gene methylation assay analysis of the foci showed balanced methylation consistent with polyclonality. CONCLUSIONS: The fibroblast foci of UIP are the leading edge of a complex reticulum that is highly interconnected and extends from the pleura into the underlying parenchyma. It is a reactive, rather than a malignant, process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200602-205oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Cool, C. D., Groshong, S. D., Rai, P. R., Henson, P. M., Stewart, J. S., & Brown, K. K.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-09-15
Volume
174
Issue
6
Pages
654-658
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2031074041
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fibroblast Foci Are Not Discrete Sites of Lung Injury or Repair: The Fibroblast Reticulum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200602-205oc
The paper
Cool, C. D., Groshong, S. D., Rai, P. R., Henson, P. M., Stewart, J. S., & Brown, K. K. (2006). Fibroblast Foci Are Not Discrete Sites of Lung Injury or Repair: The Fibroblast Reticulum. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200602-205oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.