Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 for Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Lankeit, Mareike, Kempf, Tibor, Dellas, Claudia, Cuny, Mayumi, Tapken, Heike, Peter, Timo, Olschewski, Manfred, Konstantinides, Stavros, Wollert, Kai C.·2008·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 is a cytokine induced in the heart after ischemia or pressure overload. Circulating levels of GDF-15 provide independent prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndromes or heart failure. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the prognostic value of GDF-15 in acute pulmonary embolism. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, plasma levels of GDF-15 were determined by immunoradiometric assay in 123 consecutive patients with confirmed acute pulmonary embolism. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: GDF-15 concentrations on admission ranged from 553 to 47,274 ng/L; 101 patients (82%) had GDF-15 levels above the upper limit of normal (1,200 ng/L). Patients who experienced pulmonary embolism-related complications during the first 30 days had higher baseline levels of GDF-15 (median, 6,039 [25th to 75th percentiles, 2,778 to 19,772] ng/L) compared with those with an uncomplicated course (median, 2,036 [25th to 75th percentiles, 1,279 to 3,176] ng/L; P < 0.001). By multivariable logistic regression analysis, which included clinical characteristics, cardiac biomarkers (troponin T and NT-proBNP [N-terminal propeptide of B-type natriuretic peptide]), and echocardiographic findings, GDF-15 emerged as an independent predictor of a complicated 30-day outcome (P = 0.033). The c-statistic for GDF-15 was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.90), as compared with 0.72 for cardiac troponin T, and 0.65 for NT-proBNP. The ability of troponin T, NT-proBNP, and echocardiographic findings of right ventricular dysfunction to predict the risk of a complicated 30-day outcome was enhanced by GDF-15. Furthermore, multivariable Cox regression identified baseline levels of GDF-15 as an independent predictor of long-term mortality (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GDF-15 is a promising new biomarker for risk stratification of pulmonary embolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200712-1786oc

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Lankeit, M., Kempf, T., Dellas, C., Cuny, M., Tapken, H., Peter, T., Olschewski, M., Konstantinides, S., & Wollert, K. C.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
177
Issue
9
Pages
1018-1025
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2120970624
Cited by
187
References
3
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth Differentiation Factor-15 for Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200712-1786oc
The paper
Lankeit, M., Kempf, T., Dellas, C., Cuny, M., Tapken, H., Peter, T., Olschewski, M., Konstantinides, S., & Wollert, K. C. (2008). Growth Differentiation Factor-15 for Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200712-1786oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.