Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography: Three-year Results from the DANTE Trial

Infante, Maurizio, Cavuto, Silvio, Lutman, Fabio Romano, Brambilla, Giorgio, Chiesa, Giuseppe, Ceresoli, Giovanni, Passera, Eliseo, Angeli, Enzo, Chiarenza, Maurizio, Aranzulla, Giuseppe, Cariboni, Umberto, Errico, Valentina, Inzirillo, Francesco, Bottoni, Edoardo, Voulaz, Emanuele, Alloisio, Marco, Destro, Anna, Roncalli, Massimo, Santoro, Armando, Ravasi, Gianluigi·2009·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Screening for lung cancer with modern imaging technology may decrease lung cancer mortality, but encouraging results have only been obtained in uncontrolled studies. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect of screening with low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT) on lung cancer mortality. Secondary endpoints are incidence, stage at diagnosis, and resectability. METHODS: Male subjects, aged 60 to 75 years, smokers of 20 or more pack-years, were randomized to screening with LDCT or control groups. All participants underwent a baseline, once-only chest X-ray and sputum cytology examination. Screening-arm subjects had LDCT upon accrual to be repeated every year for 4 years, whereas controls had a yearly medical examination only. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 2,811 subjects were randomized and 2,472 were enrolled (LDCT, 1,276; control, 1,196). After a median follow-up of 33 months, lung cancer was detected in 60 (4.7%) patients receiving LDCT and 34 (2.8%) control subjects (P = 0.016). Resectability rates were similar in both groups. More patients with stage I disease were detected by LDCT (54 vs. 34%; P = 0.06) and fewer cases were detected in the screening arm due to intercurrent symptoms. However, the number of advanced lung cancer cases was the same as in the control arm. Twenty patients in the LDCT group (1.6%) and 20 controls (1.7%) died of lung cancer, whereas 26 and 25 died of other causes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality benefit from lung cancer screening by LDCT might be far smaller than anticipated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200901-0076oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Infante, M., Cavuto, S., Lutman, F. R., Brambilla, G., Chiesa, G., Ceresoli, G., Passera, E., Angeli, E., Chiarenza, M., Aranzulla, G., Cariboni, U., Errico, V., Inzirillo, F., Bottoni, E., Voulaz, E., Alloisio, M., Destro, A., Roncalli, M., Santoro, A., & Ravasi, G.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
180
Issue
5
Pages
445-453
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1978613158
Cited by
379
References
1
FWCI
20.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography: Three-year Results from the DANTE Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200901-0076oc
The paper
Infante, M., Cavuto, S., Lutman, F. R., Brambilla, G., Chiesa, G., Ceresoli, G., Passera, E., Angeli, E., Chiarenza, M., Aranzulla, G., Cariboni, U., Errico, V., Inzirillo, F., Bottoni, E., Voulaz, E., Alloisio, M., Destro, A., Roncalli, M., Santoro, A., & Ravasi, G. (2009). A Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography: Three-year Results from the DANTE Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200901-0076oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.