Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial

Open access
Castro, Mario, Rubin, Adalberto S., Laviolette, Michel, Fiterman, Jussara, De Andrade Lima, Marina, Shah, Pallav L., Fiss, Elie, Olivenstein, Ronald, Thomson, Neil C., Niven, Robert M., Pavord, Ian D., Simoff, Michael, Duhamel, David R., McEvoy, Charlene, Barbers, Richard, ten Hacken, Nicolaas H.T., Wechsler, Michael E., Holmes, Mark, Phillips, Martin J., Erzurum, Serpil, Lunn, William, Israel, Elliot, Jarjour, Nizar, Kraft, Monica, Shargill, Narinder S., Quiring, John, Berry, Scott M., Cox, Gerard·2010·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT versus a sham procedure in subjects with severe asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists. METHODS: A total of 288 adult subjects (Intent-to-Treat [ITT]) randomized to BT or sham control underwent three bronchoscopy procedures. Primary outcome was the difference in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores from baseline to average of 6, 9, and 12 months (integrated AQLQ). Adverse events and health care use were collected to assess safety. Statistical design and analysis of the primary endpoint was Bayesian. Target posterior probability of superiority (PPS) of BT over sham was 95%, except for the primary endpoint (96.4%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The improvement from baseline in the integrated AQLQ score was superior in the BT group compared with sham (BT, 1.35 +/- 1.10; sham, 1.16 +/- 1.23 [PPS, 96.0% ITT and 97.9% per protocol]). Seventy-nine percent of BT and 64% of sham subjects achieved changes in AQLQ of 0.5 or greater (PPS, 99.6%). Six percent more BT subjects were hospitalized in the treatment period (up to 6 wk after BT). In the posttreatment period (6-52 wk after BT), the BT group experienced fewer severe exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits, and days missed from work/school compared with the sham group (PPS, 95.5, 99.9, and 99.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BT in subjects with severe asthma improves asthma-specific quality of life with a reduction in severe exacerbations and healthcare use in the posttreatment period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinialtrials.gov (NCT00231114).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200903-0354oc

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 672

Metadata

Authors
Castro, M., Rubin, A. S., Laviolette, M., Fiterman, J., De Andrade Lima, M., Shah, P. L., Fiss, E., Olivenstein, R., Thomson, N. C., Niven, R. M., Pavord, I. D., Simoff, M., Duhamel, D. R., McEvoy, C., Barbers, R., ten Hacken, N. H. T., Wechsler, M. E., Holmes, M., Phillips, M. J., Erzurum, S., Lunn, W., Israel, E., Jarjour, N., Kraft, M., Shargill, N. S., Quiring, J., Berry, S. M., & Cox, G.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2010-01-15
Volume
181
Issue
2
Pages
116-124
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2956481022
Cited by
672
References
2
FWCI
22.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200903-0354oc
The paper
Castro, M., Rubin, A. S., Laviolette, M., Fiterman, J., De Andrade Lima, M., Shah, P. L., Fiss, E., Olivenstein, R., Thomson, N. C., Niven, R. M., Pavord, I. D., Simoff, M., Duhamel, D. R., McEvoy, C., Barbers, R., ten Hacken, N. H. T., Wechsler, M. E., Holmes, M., Phillips, M. J., . . . Cox, G. (2010). Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200903-0354oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.