The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
RATIONALE: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT versus a sham procedure in subjects with severe asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists. METHODS: A total of 288 adult subjects (Intent-to-Treat [ITT]) randomized to BT or sham control underwent three bronchoscopy procedures. Primary outcome was the difference in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores from baseline to average of 6, 9, and 12 months (integrated AQLQ). Adverse events and health care use were collected to assess safety. Statistical design and analysis of the primary endpoint was Bayesian. Target posterior probability of superiority (PPS) of BT over sham was 95%, except for the primary endpoint (96.4%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The improvement from baseline in the integrated AQLQ score was superior in the BT group compared with sham (BT, 1.35 +/- 1.10; sham, 1.16 +/- 1.23 [PPS, 96.0% ITT and 97.9% per protocol]). Seventy-nine percent of BT and 64% of sham subjects achieved changes in AQLQ of 0.5 or greater (PPS, 99.6%). Six percent more BT subjects were hospitalized in the treatment period (up to 6 wk after BT). In the posttreatment period (6-52 wk after BT), the BT group experienced fewer severe exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits, and days missed from work/school compared with the sham group (PPS, 95.5, 99.9, and 99.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BT in subjects with severe asthma improves asthma-specific quality of life with a reduction in severe exacerbations and healthcare use in the posttreatment period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinialtrials.gov (NCT00231114).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Connolly, S. J., Sheldon, R., Thorpe, K. E., Roberts, R. S., Ellenbogen, K. A., Wilkoff, B. L., Morillo, C., Gent, M., & for the VPS II Investigators (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.17.2224 · Cited by 500
The Pursuit of Balance Using Stratified and Dynamic Randomization Techniques: An Overview
McEntegart, D. J. (2003) · Drug Information Journal · doi:10.1177/009286150303700305 · Cited by 145 · cited 1×
“Eligible subjects were randomized (2:1) to the BT or the sham group according to a computer-generated scheme stratified by baseline AQLQ, percentage of symptom-free days, and site, using the Minimum Dynamic Allocation method (12).”
Method
Cited by
Papi, A., Brightling, C., Pedersen, S. E., & Reddel, H. K. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)33311-1 · Cited by 1,759
After asthma: redefining airways diseases
Pavord, I. D., Beasley, R., Agusti, A., Anderson, G. P., Bel, E., Brusselle, G., Cullinan, P., Custovic, A., Ducharme, F. M., Fahy, J. V., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30879-6 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationCloutier, M. M., Baptist, A. P., Blake, K. V., Brooks, E. G., Bryant-Stephens, T., DiMango, E., Dixon, A. E., Elward, K. S., Hartert, T., Krishnan, J. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.003 · Cited by 854
Severe and Difficult-to-Treat Asthma in Adults
Israel, E., & Reddel, H. K. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1608969 · Cited by 474
Self-citationManagement of severe asthma in children
Bush, A., & Saglani, S. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61054-9 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Castro, M., Rubin, A. S., Laviolette, M., Fiterman, J., De Andrade Lima, M., Shah, P. L., Fiss, E., Olivenstein, R., Thomson, N. C., Niven, R. M., Pavord, I. D., Simoff, M., Duhamel, D. R., McEvoy, C., Barbers, R., ten Hacken, N. H. T., Wechsler, M. E., Holmes, M., Phillips, M. J., Erzurum, S., Lunn, W., Israel, E., Jarjour, N., Kraft, M., Shargill, N. S., Quiring, J., Berry, S. M., & Cox, G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-01-15
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-124
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2956481022
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200903-0354oc
- The paper
- Castro, M., Rubin, A. S., Laviolette, M., Fiterman, J., De Andrade Lima, M., Shah, P. L., Fiss, E., Olivenstein, R., Thomson, N. C., Niven, R. M., Pavord, I. D., Simoff, M., Duhamel, D. R., McEvoy, C., Barbers, R., ten Hacken, N. H. T., Wechsler, M. E., Holmes, M., Phillips, M. J., . . . Cox, G. (2010). Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200903-0354oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.