Cited by 148Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsOptimal Experimental Design MethodsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

The Pursuit of Balance Using Stratified and Dynamic Randomization Techniques: An Overview

McEntegart, Damian J.·2003·Drug Information Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/009286150303700305

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McEntegart, D. J.
Corresponding author
McEntegart, Damian J.
Venue
Drug Information Journal
Published
2003-07
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
293-308
ISSN
  • 0092-8615 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-9200
OpenAlex
W2011792098
Cited by
145
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Drug Information Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
stratified randomization, prognostic factors, statistical efficiency, minimization, optimal allocation, drug supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review