Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 647

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Short, Highly Effective, and Inexpensive Standardized Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis

Van Deun, Armand, Maug, Aung Kya Jai, Salim, Md Abdul Hamid, Das, Pankaj Kumar, Sarker, Mihir Ranjan, Daru, Paul, Rieder, Hans L.·2010·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Based on expert opinion, the global guidelines for management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis impose lengthy and often poorly tolerated treatments. OBJECTIVES: This observational study evaluates the effectiveness of standardized regimens for patients with proven multidrug-resistant tuberculosis previously untreated with second-line drugs in low-income countries. METHODS: Consenting patients were sequentially assigned to one of six standardized treatment regimens. Subsequent cohorts were treated with regimens adapted according to results in prior cohorts. The study was designed to minimize failure and default while reducing total treatment duration without increasing relapse frequency. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We report the treatment outcome of all patients with laboratory-confirmed, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis enrolled from May 1997 to December 2007. The most effective treatment regimen required a minimum of 9 months of treatment with gatifloxacin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide throughout the treatment period supplemented by prothionamide, kanamycin, and high-dose isoniazid during an intensive phase of a minimum of 4 months, giving a relapse-free cure of 87.9% (95% confidence interval, 82.7-91.6) among 206 patients. Major adverse drug reactions were infrequent and manageable. Compared with the 221 patients treated with regimens based on ofloxacin and commonly prothionamide throughout, the hazard ratio of any adverse outcome was 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Serial regimen formulation guided by overall treatment effectiveness resulted in treatment outcomes comparable to those obtained with first-line treatment. Confirmatory formal trials in populations with high levels of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection and in populations with a higher initial prevalence of resistance to second-line drugs are required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201001-0077oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 647

Metadata

Authors
Van Deun, A., Maug, A. K. J., Salim, M. A. H., Das, P. K., Sarker, M. R., Daru, P., & Rieder, H. L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
182
Issue
5
Pages
684-692
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2167629505
Cited by
647
References
0
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short, Highly Effective, and Inexpensive Standardized Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201001-0077oc
The paper
Van Deun, A., Maug, A. K. J., Salim, M. A. H., Das, P. K., Sarker, M. R., Daru, P., & Rieder, H. L. (2010). Short, Highly Effective, and Inexpensive Standardized Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201001-0077oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.