The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Short, Highly Effective, and Inexpensive Standardized Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis
Abstract
RATIONALE: Based on expert opinion, the global guidelines for management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis impose lengthy and often poorly tolerated treatments. OBJECTIVES: This observational study evaluates the effectiveness of standardized regimens for patients with proven multidrug-resistant tuberculosis previously untreated with second-line drugs in low-income countries. METHODS: Consenting patients were sequentially assigned to one of six standardized treatment regimens. Subsequent cohorts were treated with regimens adapted according to results in prior cohorts. The study was designed to minimize failure and default while reducing total treatment duration without increasing relapse frequency. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We report the treatment outcome of all patients with laboratory-confirmed, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis enrolled from May 1997 to December 2007. The most effective treatment regimen required a minimum of 9 months of treatment with gatifloxacin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide throughout the treatment period supplemented by prothionamide, kanamycin, and high-dose isoniazid during an intensive phase of a minimum of 4 months, giving a relapse-free cure of 87.9% (95% confidence interval, 82.7-91.6) among 206 patients. Major adverse drug reactions were infrequent and manageable. Compared with the 221 patients treated with regimens based on ofloxacin and commonly prothionamide throughout, the hazard ratio of any adverse outcome was 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Serial regimen formulation guided by overall treatment effectiveness resulted in treatment outcomes comparable to those obtained with first-line treatment. Confirmatory formal trials in populations with high levels of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection and in populations with a higher initial prevalence of resistance to second-line drugs are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in the development of new tuberculosis drugs and treatment regimens
Zumla, A., Nahid, P., & Cole, S. T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4001 · Cited by 893
Furin, J., Cox, H., & Pai, M. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30308-3 · Cited by 873
Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
Seung, K. J., Keshavjee, S., & Rich, M. L. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a017863 · Cited by 805
World Health Organization treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis, 2016 update
Falzon, D., Schünemann, H. J., Harausz, E., González-Angulo, L., Lienhardt, C., Jaramillo, E., & Weyer, K. (2017) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.02308-2016 · Cited by 420
Mirzayev, F., Viney, K., Linh, N. N., Gonzalez-Angulo, L., Gegia, M., Jaramillo, E., Zignol, M., & Kasaeva, T. (2021) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.03300-2020 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Deun, A., Maug, A. K. J., Salim, M. A. H., Das, P. K., Sarker, M. R., Daru, P., & Rieder, H. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 684-692
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2167629505
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short, Highly Effective, and Inexpensive Standardized Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201001-0077oc
- The paper
- Van Deun, A., Maug, A. K. J., Salim, M. A. H., Das, P. K., Sarker, M. R., Daru, P., & Rieder, H. L. (2010). Short, Highly Effective, and Inexpensive Standardized Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201001-0077oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.