Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kohler, Malcolm, Stoewhas, Anne-Christin, Ayers, Lisa, Senn, Oliver, Bloch, Konrad E., Russi, Erich W., Stradling, John R.·2011·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: To establish a new approach to investigate the physiological effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to evaluate novel treatments, during a period of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) withdrawal. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of CPAP withdrawal. METHODS: Forty-one patients with OSA and receiving CPAP were randomized to either CPAP withdrawal (subtherapeutic CPAP), or continued CPAP, for 2 weeks. Polysomnography, sleepiness, psychomotor performance, endothelial function, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), urinary catecholamines, blood markers of systemic inflammation, and metabolism were assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CPAP withdrawal led to a recurrence of OSA within a few days and a return of subjective sleepiness, but was not associated with significant deterioration of psychomotor performance within 2 weeks. Endothelial function, assessed by flow-mediated dilatation, decreased significantly in the CPAP withdrawal group compared with therapeutic CPAP (mean difference in change, -3.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.5, -1.9%; P < 0.001). Compared with continuing CPAP, 2 weeks of CPAP withdrawal was associated with a significant increase in morning systolic BP (mean difference in change, +8.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, +1.7, +15.3 mm Hg; P = 0.016), morning diastolic BP (mean difference in change, +6.9 mm Hg; 95% CI, +1.9, +11.9 mm Hg; P = 0.008), and morning HR (mean difference in change, +6.3 bpm, 95% CI, +0.4, +12.2 bpm; P = 0.035). CPAP withdrawal was associated with an increase in urinary catecholamines but did not lead to an increase in markers of systemic inflammation, insulin resistance, or blood lipids. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP withdrawal usually leads to a rapid recurrence of OSA, a return of subjective sleepiness, and is associated with impaired endothelial function, increased urinary catecholamines, blood pressure, and heart rate. Thus the proposed study model appears to be suitable to evaluate physiological and therapeutic effects in OSA. Clinical trial registered with www.controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN93153804).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201106-0964oc

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Kohler, M., Stoewhas, A.-C., Ayers, L., Senn, O., Bloch, K. E., Russi, E. W., & Stradling, J. R.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
184
Issue
10
Pages
1192-1199
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1918196193
Cited by
286
References
8
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201106-0964oc
The paper
Kohler, M., Stoewhas, A.-C., Ayers, L., Senn, O., Bloch, K. E., Russi, E. W., & Stradling, J. R. (2011). Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Withdrawal in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201106-0964oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.