Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Annual Change in Pulmonary Function and Clinical Phenotype in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Nishimura, Masaharu, Makita, Hironi, Nagai, Katsura, Konno, Satoshi, Nasuhara, Yasuyuki, Hasegawa, Masaru, Shimizu, Kaoruko, Betsuyaku, Tomoko, Ito, Yoichi M., Fuke, Satoshi, Igarashi, Takeshi, Akiyama, Yasushi, Ogura, Shigeaki·2012·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Although the rate of annual decline in FEV1 is one of the most important outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), little is known about intersubject variability based on clinical phenotypes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the intersubject variability in a 5-year observational cohort study, particularly focusing on emphysema severity. METHODS: A total of 279 eligible patients with COPD (stages I-IV: 26, 45, 24, and 5%) participated. We conducted a detailed assessment of pulmonary function and computed tomography (CT) at baseline, and performed spirometry every 6 months before and after inhalation of bronchodilator. Smoking status, exacerbation, and pharmacotherapy were carefully monitored. Emphysema severity was evaluated by CT and annual measurements of carbon monoxide transfer coefficient. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using mixed effects model analysis, the annual decline in post-bronchodilator FEV1 was -32±24 (SD) ml/yr (n=261). We classified the subjects of less than the 25th percentile as Rapid decliners, the 25th to 75th percentile as Slow decliners, and greater than the 75th percentile as Sustainers (-63±2, -31±1, and -2±1 [SE] ml/yr). Emphysema severity, but not %FEV1, showed significant differences among the three groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the Rapid decliners were independently associated with emphysema severity assessed either by CT or carbon monoxide transfer coefficient. The Sustainers displayed less emphysema and higher levels of circulating eosinophils. CONCLUSIONS: Emphysema severity is independently associated with a rapid annual decline in FEV1 in COPD. Sustainers and Rapid decliners warrant specific attention in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201106-0992oc

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Nishimura, M., Makita, H., Nagai, K., Konno, S., Nasuhara, Y., Hasegawa, M., Shimizu, K., Betsuyaku, T., Ito, Y. M., Fuke, S., Igarashi, T., Akiyama, Y., & Ogura, S.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
185
Issue
1
Pages
44-52
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2116954144
Cited by
344
References
36
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annual Change in Pulmonary Function and Clinical Phenotype in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201106-0992oc
The paper
Nishimura, M., Makita, H., Nagai, K., Konno, S., Nasuhara, Y., Hasegawa, M., Shimizu, K., Betsuyaku, T., Ito, Y. M., Fuke, S., Igarashi, T., Akiyama, Y., & Ogura, S. (2012). Annual Change in Pulmonary Function and Clinical Phenotype in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201106-0992oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.