Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 635

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Application of Esophageal Pressure Measurement in Patients with Respiratory Failure

Akoumianaki, Evangelia, Maggiore, Salvatore M., Valenza, Franco, Bellani, Giacomo, Jubran, Amal, Loring, Stephen H., Pelosi, Paolo, Talmor, Daniel, Grasso, Salvatore, Chiumello, Davide, Guérin, Claude, Patroniti, Nicolo, Ranieri, V. Marco, Gattinoni, Luciano, Nava, Stefano, Terragni, Pietro-Paolo, Pesenti, Antonio, Tobin, Martin, Mancebo, Jordi, Brochard, Laurent·2014·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

This report summarizes current physiological and technical knowledge on esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The respiratory changes in Pes are representative of changes in pleural pressure. The difference between airway pressure (Paw) and Pes is a valid estimate of transpulmonary pressure. Pes helps determine what fraction of Paw is applied to overcome lung and chest wall elastance. Pes is usually measured via a catheter with an air-filled thin-walled latex balloon inserted nasally or orally. To validate Pes measurement, a dynamic occlusion test measures the ratio of change in Pes to change in Paw during inspiratory efforts against a closed airway. A ratio close to unity indicates that the system provides a valid measurement. Provided transpulmonary pressure is the lung-distending pressure, and that chest wall elastance may vary among individuals, a physiologically based ventilator strategy should take the transpulmonary pressure into account. For monitoring purposes, clinicians rely mostly on Paw and flow waveforms. However, these measurements may mask profound patient-ventilator asynchrony and do not allow respiratory muscle effort assessment. Pes also permits the measurement of transmural vascular pressures during both passive and active breathing. Pes measurements have enhanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of acute lung injury, patient-ventilator interaction, and weaning failure. The use of Pes for positive end-expiratory pressure titration may help improve oxygenation and compliance. Pes measurements make it feasible to individualize the level of muscle effort during mechanical ventilation and weaning. The time is now right to apply the knowledge obtained with Pes to improve the management of critically ill and ventilator-dependent patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201312-2193ci

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 635

Metadata

Authors
Akoumianaki, E., Maggiore, S. M., Valenza, F., Bellani, G., Jubran, A., Loring, S. H., Pelosi, P., Talmor, D., Grasso, S., Chiumello, D., Guérin, C., Patroniti, N., Ranieri, V. M., Gattinoni, L., Nava, S., Terragni, P.-P., Pesenti, A., Tobin, M., Mancebo, J., & Brochard, L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
189
Issue
5
Pages
520-531
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2147069468
Cited by
635
References
5
FWCI
34.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Application of Esophageal Pressure Measurement in Patients with Respiratory Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201312-2193ci
The paper
Akoumianaki, E., Maggiore, S. M., Valenza, F., Bellani, G., Jubran, A., Loring, S. H., Pelosi, P., Talmor, D., Grasso, S., Chiumello, D., Guérin, C., Patroniti, N., Ranieri, V. M., Gattinoni, L., Nava, S., Terragni, P.-P., Pesenti, A., Tobin, M., Mancebo, J., & Brochard, L. (2014). The Application of Esophageal Pressure Measurement in Patients with Respiratory Failure. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201312-2193ci

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.