Cited by 1EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

Assessing students’ use of language learning strategies and their impact on study year

Open access
Degissew, Dagim, Beriso, Italo·2022·International Journal of Language and Linguistics

Abstract

Language learning strategies become the main factor that determines how and how well students learn a second or foreign language. They are essential tools for enabling students to learn successfully in acquiring the desired knowledge and skills. However, students’ proficiency and achievement in English language at different educational levels are not as expected from them. Therefore, this study attempted to assess the language learning strategies which were used by English major students of Addis Ababa University. The study employed mixed approach. The type of research method was descriptive survey. The total numbers of participants were 37 English major students of Addis Ababa University. The data were collected through questionnaire and interview. SPSS version 24 software was utilized to mainly analyze the quantitative part. For the qualitative part, Open code software was used. The result indicated that students were medium user of language learning strategies. The order of strategy use from the most used to the least used was as: metacognitive, social, affective, compensation, cognitive and memory respectively. All strategy type did not indicate Low range use. Statistically a significance difference was reported between second year (M=3.62, SD=0.44) and third year students’ score (M=3.05, SD=0.75) in using strategies in general, t (30)=2.552, p=0.016. Thus, Study year, had an impact on students’ use of strategy in the study. So as to increase strategies use, language learners are recommended to become familiar with language learning strategies. Finally, factors such as, motivation, proficiency level and learning style need to be further investigated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11648/j.ijll.20221002.13

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies suggest that Ethiopian students generally rely on rote memorization and are unfamiliar with effective VLSs.

    “Studies suggest that Ethiopian students generally rely on rote memorization and are unfamiliar with effective VLSs (Gebremedhin, 2018;Asefaw, 2021;Degissew and Beriso, 2022).”

    From Effect of vocabulary learning strategies on students’ vocabulary knowledge achievement and motivation: the case of grade 11 high school students (2024) · cites this paper as Degissew and Beriso, 2022

    The Results (section 3.1.2; page unavailable) report that memory strategies were the least preferred, while metacognitive and social strategies were used frequently—the opposite of a general reliance on memorization. The study examined 37 English majors at Addis Ababa University, not Ethiopian students generally, and does not establish that they were unfamiliar with effective vocabulary-learning strategies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous Ethiopian studies have mainly used quantitative methods, indicating the need for a mixed-method approach.

    “Additionally, previous Ethiopian studies have mainly used quantitative methods, indicating the need for a mixed-method approach to provide deeper insights (Gebremedhin, 2018;Asefaw, 2021;Degissew and Beriso, 2022).”

    From Effect of vocabulary learning strategies on students’ vocabulary knowledge achievement and motivation: the case of grade 11 high school students (2024) · cites this paper as Degissew and Beriso, 2022

    The Statement of the Problem identifies a gap in the topics studied by local researchers, not in their methods. Research Design (§2.1) says this paper used a mixed approach, but our copy does not say that previous Ethiopian studies were mainly quantitative or that their methods created a need for mixed-method research (searched for previous studies’ methods and a methodological gap). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abebe, G. (1997). Strategies of vocabulary learning of AAU freshman learning English as a second/foreign language. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  2. Al-Buainain, H. (2010). Language learning strategies employed by English majors at Qatar University: Questions and Queries. ASIATIC, 4 (2), 92-120.
  3. Atlabachew, G. (2017) Reading engagement and academic performance: A case of Adama Science and Technology University first year students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Addis Ababa University.
  4. Birhanu, B. (1993). Listener strategies in collaborative discourse of Addis Abeba university, fourth year students. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  5. Endaweke, A. (2008) EFL learning strategy use: the case of male and female preparatory students. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  6. Getnet, G. (2008). Vocabulary-learning strategy use: The case of high and low achiever students in Gondar college of teacher education. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  7. Girma, G. (1994). A preliminary investigation into the reading strategies of AAU first year students. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  8. Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationships between patterns of reported language learning strategy (LLS) use by speaker of other languages (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Auckland.
  9. Haregewoin, A. (2008). The effects of communicative grammar on the grammatical accuracy of students' academic writing: An integrated approach to TEFL. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Addis Ababa University.
  10. Lemlem, S. (2013). Students' preferences and use of vocabulary learning strategies: Awash military college in focus. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  11. Magno, C. (2010). Korean students' language learning strategies and year of studying English as predictors of proficiency in English. TESOL Journal, 2, 39-61.
  12. Niguse, M. (2013). An exploration of beliefs about language learning and their language learning strategy use of EFL learners: Debremarkos university in focus. Un Published PhD Dissertation. Addis Ababa University.
  13. Seyoum, A. (2009). Language learning strategies use: The case of high and low achievers at Mekelle college of teacher education. Unpublished MA. Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  14. Teshome, T. (2007). Exploring the effectiveness of the teaching and learning of the writing skills: Asella college of Teachers' Education in Focus. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  15. Teshome, Y. (2003). Transformations in higher education: experience with reform regional training in Ethiopian higher education system'. Keynote Paper Prepared for Regional Training Conference on Improving Tertiary Education in Sub- Saharan Africa: Acray.
  16. Uztosun, M. S. (2014). The impact of language experience on language learner strategy use in Turkish EFL context. International Journal on Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5 (1), 157-168.
  17. Yalew. E. (2004). Psycho-educational and family factors that contribute to aggression in schools. A PhD Dissertation. University of Leipzig, institute of Applied psychology, Leipzig.
  18. Yechalework, A. (2017). Reading strategy use: the case of high and low achievers at private high schools of KB academy grade nine and ten students. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
  19. Yemeserach. B. (2015). Grammar learning strategies use of grade 11 students at Medhanealem preparatory school: gender in focus. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.

Authors
Degissew, D., & Beriso, I.
Affiliations
  • Wolaita Sodo University (ET)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
Venue
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Published
2022
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
77
ISSN
2330-0205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4290608940
Cited by
1
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Language and Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
language learning strategies, English as a foreign language, metacognitive strategies, social strategies, affective strategies, compensatory strategies, cognitive strategies, memory strategies, English majors, strategy use, Addis Ababa University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review