The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CO2 Adsorption by Functionalized Nanoporous Materials: A Review
Abstract
This review highlights the recent advances in the development of functionalized nanoporous adsorbents for CO2 capture. Three main classes of materials are taken into account: zeolites, mesoporous silicates, and metal organic frameworks (MOFs). Proper modification of the cation content of zeolites, as well as the introduction of functional groups such as amine groups into ordered mesoporous silicates and MOFs, greatly enhance the CO2 adsorptive properties of these substrates. Specifically, cation-exchanged zeolites can be currently considered the benchmark for ordered nanoporous CO2 adsorbents, finding application also on a plant scale. Amino-functionalized mesoporous silicates tend to show a high affinity toward CO2: while this could be an advantage when pushed purification is needed, it also implies that full regeneration of the adsorbent can be achieved only by putting its surface in contact with a completely CO2-free environment. On the contrary, similarly modified MOFs show higher CO2 adsorption working capacities: this potentially makes them even better candidates than their mesoporous inorganic homologues for a plant scale use. However, the persisting lack of reliable methods for the pelletization of both ordered mesoporous silicates and MOFs creates a care for further development efforts in the next future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Amine grafing on zeolites has gained attention in the last years for carbon capture applications, although in this case the protagonists are still amine-grafted mesoporous silicas.”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [158]
In the citing paper
“One of the most promising methods for reducing atmospheric CO2 is adsorption, which offers excellent stability, straightforward regeneration, and effective adsorption capabilities6–8.”
From Metals incorporated agricultural waste corn Cob-based biochar used as an adsorbent for CO2 capturing (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CO 2 photo-reduction: insights into CO 2 activation and reaction on surfaces of photocatalysts
Chang, X., Wang, T., & Gong, J. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee00383d · Cited by 2,042
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126
Adsorption of heavy metals on functionalized-mesoporous silica: A review
Da’na, E. (2017) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.050 · Cited by 481
Stability of amine-functionalized CO 2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle
Lashaki, M. J., Khiavi, S., & Sayari, A. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00877a · Cited by 474
Carbon Capture From Flue Gas and the Atmosphere: A Perspective
Wang, X., & Song, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.560849 · Cited by 428
“Many reviews on solidsorbent–based CO2 capture have been published (Song, 2006; SanzPérez et al., 2016; Darunte et al., 2016; Choi et al., 2009; D’Alessandro et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2016; Didas et al., 2015; Dutcher et al., 2015; Chen C. et al., 2014; Gargiulo et al., 2014; Olajire, 2017).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gargiulo, N., Pepe, F., & Caputo, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- American Scientific Publishers
- Published
- 2014-02-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1811-1822
- ISSN
- 1533-4880 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4899
- OpenAlex
- W2326306759
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Keywords
- CO2 adsorption, CO2 capture, zeolites, cation-exchanged zeolites, mesoporous silicates, metal-organic frameworks, amino-functionalized MOF, adsorbent regeneration, pelletization
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Carbon Dioxide, Materials Testing, Molecular Conformation, Particle Size, Surface Properties, Nanostructures, Nanopores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review