The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search
Open accessAbstract
Vision is an active process: We repeatedly move our eyes to seek out objects of interest and explore our environment. Visual search experiments capture aspects of this process, by having subjects look for a target within a background of distractors. Search speed often correlates with target-distractor discriminability; search is faster when the target and distractors look quite different. However, there are notable exceptions. A given discriminability can yield efficient searches (where the target seems to "pop-out") as well as inefficient ones (where additional distractors make search significantly slower and more difficult). Search is often more difficult when finding the target requires distinguishing a particular configuration or conjunction of features. Search asymmetries abound. These puzzling results have fueled three decades of theoretical and experimental studies. We argue that the key issue in search is the processing of image patches in the periphery, where visual representation is characterized by summary statistics computed over a sizable pooling region. By quantifying these statistics, we predict a set of classic search results, as well as peripheral discriminability of crowded patches such as those found in search displays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,147
A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026553619983 · Cited by 1,806
Metamers of the ventral stream
Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2889 · Cited by 667
Rosenholtz, R. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.985 · Cited by 68 · cited 2×
“Since FIT strongly relies on the choice of features, the field has spent many years trying to enumerate the “basic features,” and researchers have tended to adjust the list of basic features with each new search result (Rosenholtz, 2001b).”
Cited by
Metamers of the ventral stream
Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2889 · Cited by 667
Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition
Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003 · Cited by 586
Multi-level crowding and the paradox of object recognition in clutter
Manassi, M., & Whitney, D. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.051 · Cited by 102
A decisional account of subjective inflation of visual perception at the periphery
Solovey, G., Graney, G. G., & Lau, H. (2015) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0769-1 · Cited by 63
Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
Feather, J., Leclerc, G., Mądry, A., & McDermott, J. H. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01442-0 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenholtz, R., Huang, J., Raj, A., Balas, B. J., & Ilie, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2012-04-20
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 14-14
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019790087
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/12.4.14
- The paper
- Rosenholtz, R., Huang, J., Raj, A., Balas, B. J., & Ilie, L. (2012). A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.4.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.