The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination
Open accessAbstract
Human faces look more similar to each other when they are presented upside down, leading to an increase in error rate and response time during individual face discrimination tasks. This face inversion effect (FIE) is one of the most robust findings in the face processing literature. Recent neuroimaging studies using adaptation to face identity have shown that the "fusiform face area" was the primary neural source of the behavioral FIE. However, the time course of the FIE, that is, when inversion affects the coding of facial identity in the human brain, remains unclear. Here, we addressed this question by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) on the scalp during an adaptation paradigm with upright and inverted faces. Subjects were presented first with an adapting face stimulus for 3,000 ms, followed by a second face of either the same identity or a different identity. Starting at about 160 ms after stimulus onset, the ERP response to the second face stimulus was markedly reduced over occipitotemporal electrode sites when it was identical to the adapting face, during the N170 time window. When the exact same stimuli were presented upside down, the reduction of signal was smaller and took place about 30 ms later, in line with the behavioral effect of inversion. This result shows that face inversion affects the early encoding of face identity in the occipitotemporal cortex at about 160 ms. Because inversion is known to disrupt massively the integration of facial features, these observations provide indirect evidence that individual faces are processed holistically as early as 160 ms after stimulus onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538
Yin, R. K. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027474 · Cited by 2,624
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.
Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Müller, K.-M., & Jeffery, L. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3022 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Neural mechanisms of social attention
Nummenmaa, L., & Calder, A. J. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.006 · Cited by 428
Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology
Rossion, B. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013 · Cited by 314
Self-citationDistinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis
Rossion, B. (2009) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.002 · Cited by 253
Self-citationThe cognitive and neural development of face recognition in humans
McKone, E., Crookes, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2009) · The Cognitive Neurosciences · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0042 · Cited by 77
EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception
Moulson, M. C., Balas, B., Nelson, C., & Sinha, P. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.046 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacques, C., d'Arripe, O., & Rossion, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2007-06-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163870469
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.