Cited by 77Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The cognitive and neural development of face recognition in humans

McKone, Elinor, Crookes, Kate, Kanwisher, Nancy·2009·The Cognitive Neurosciences

Abstract

Conventional wisdom has long held that face recognition develops very slowly throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence, with perceptual experience as the primary engine of this development. However, striking new findings from just the last few years have overturned much of this traditional view by demonstrating genetic influences on the face recognition system as well as impressive face discrimination abilities present in newborns and in monkeys who were reared without ever seeing a face. Nevertheless, experience does play a role, for example in narrowing the range of facial subtypes for which discrimination is possible and perhaps also increasing discrimination abilities within that range. Here we first describe the cognitive and neural characteristics of the adult system for face recognition, and then we chart the development of this system over infancy and childhood. This review identifies a fascinating new puzzle to be targeted in future research: all qualitative aspects of adult face recognition measured behaviorally are present very early in development (by 4 yrs of age; all that have been tested are also present in infancy) – yet fMRI and ERP evidence shows very late maturity of face-selective neural responses (with the fusiform face area increasing substantially in volume between age 7 and adulthood).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0042

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Babies are very much attracted to things with generic features of upright faces starting from birth, and acquire face-specific cortical areas in their first few years of life if not earlier.

    “Indeed, we know that babies are very much attracted to things with these generic features of upright faces starting from birth, and that they will acquire face-specific cortical areas38 in their first few years of life if not earlier (McKone et al., 2009).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as McKone et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKone, E., Crookes, K., & Kanwisher, N.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Venue
The Cognitive Neurosciences
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2009-09-18
OpenAlex
W184523846
Cited by
77
References
105
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Cognitive Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), face recognition development, infancy, childhood, fusiform face area, face-selective neural responses, face discrimination, perceptual experience, neuronal maturation, neonates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review