The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes
Open accessAbstract
Humans select relevant locations in a scene by means of stimulus-driven bottom-up and context-dependent top-down mechanisms. These have mainly been investigated by recording eye movements under 2D natural or 3D artificial stimulation conditions. Here we try to close that obvious gap and presented 2D and 3D versions of natural, pink, and white noise images to human subjects. Importantly, ground truth distance was obtained for all image pairs by laser scanning. Recording eye movements, we investigated the influence of disparity information and of higher order scene correlations on basic saccade properties and on saliency of bottom-up information. Our results show that the removal of higher order correlations changed saccadic rate, length and main sequence, and the subjects' explorative behavior. Introduction of disparity information countered these effects and alleviated differences between image categories. Disparity information had no effect on the saliency of monocular image features like luminance and texture contrast; however, without higher order correlations these features were uncorrelated to fixation locations. An analysis of binocular image features revealed that participants fixated closer locations earlier than more distant locations. Importantly, this also held for 2D natural images. Taken together, we conclude that depth information changes basic eye movement properties and provides a salient image feature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1411 · Cited by 1,766 · cited 2×
“Many image features have already been analyzed for their relevance in attentional processes but to give a complete list of relevant visual features is a difficult task (Wolfe & Horowitz, 2004).”
BackgroundCoding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones
lriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 2×
“The size of receptive fields representing near space depended on reaching distance, as tool use can extend their size ( Iriki, Tanaka, & Iwamura, 1996 ).”
Background
Cited by
Eye tracking in virtual reality
Clay, V., König, P., & König, S. U. (2019) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.12.1.3 · Cited by 412
A Theory of Resonance: Towards an Ecological Cognitive Architecture
Raja, V. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-017-9431-8 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Jansen, L., Onat, S., & Konig, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-29
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106587864
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/9.1.29
- The paper
- Jansen, L., Onat, S., & Konig, P. (2009). Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.1.29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.