The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refractive Error and Visual Impairment in Urban Children in Southern China
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in a metropolitan area of southern China. METHODS: Random selection of geographically defined clusters was used to identify children 5 to 15 years of age in Guangzhou. Children in 22 clusters were enumerated through a door-to-door survey and examined in 71 schools and 19 community facilities from October 2002 to January 2003. The examination included visual acuity measurements, ocular motility evaluation, retinoscopy, and autorefraction under cycloplegia and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus. RESULTS: A total of 5053 children living in 4814 households were enumerated, and 4364 (86.4%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best-corrected visual acuity 20/40 or worse in the better eye was 22.3%, 10.3%, and 0.62%, respectively. Refractive error was the cause in 94.9% of the 2335 eyes with reduced vision, amblyopia in 1.9%, other causes in 0.4%, and unexplained causes in the remaining 2.8%. External and anterior segment abnormalities were seen in 1496 (34.3%) children, mainly minor conjunctival abnormalities. Media and fundus abnormalities were observed in 32 (0.73%) children. Myopia (spherical equivalent of at least -0.50 D in either eye) measured with retinoscopy affected 73.1% of children 15 years of age, 78.4% with autorefraction. The prevalence of myopia was 3.3% in 5-year-olds with retinoscopy and 5.7% with autorefraction. Females had a significantly higher risk of myopia. Hyperopia (+2.00 D or more) measured with retinoscopy was present in 16.7% of 5-year-olds, 17.0% with autorefraction. The prevalence of hyperopia was below 1% in 15-year-olds, with both methods. Astigmatism (cylinder of > or = 0.75 D) was present in 33.6% of children with retinoscopy and in 42.7% with autorefraction. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of reduced vision because of myopia is high in school-age children living in metropolitan Guangzhou, representing an important public health problem. One third of these children do not have the necessary corrective spectacles. Effective strategies are needed to eliminate this easily treated cause of significant visual impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 735
Refractive error study in children: results from Shunyi District, China
Zhao, J., Pan, X., Sui, R., Munoz, S. R., Sperduto, R. D., & Ellwein, L. B. (2000) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00452-3 · Cited by 583
Self-citationRefractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi.
Murthy, G. V. S., Gupta, S., Ellwein, L. B., Muñoz, S., Pokharel, G. P., Sanga, L., & Bachani, D. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 556
Self-citationRefractive error in children in a rural population in India.
Dandona, R., Dandona, L., Marmamula, S., Sahare, P., Narsaiah, S., Muñoz, S., Pokharel, G. P., & Ellwein, L. B. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 534
Self-citationRefractive error study in children: results from La Florida, Chile
Maul, E., Barroso, S., Munoz, S. R., Sperduto, R. D., & Ellwein, L. B. (2000) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00454-7 · Cited by 509
Self-citationEpidemiologic Study of Ocular Refraction among Schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995
Lin, L. L., Shih, Y., Tsai, C., Chen, C., LEE, L.-A., Hung, P., & Hou, P. (1999) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1999.tb05395.x · Cited by 472
Refractive error study in children: results from Mechi Zone, Nepal
Pokharel, G. P., Negrel, A. D., Munoz, S. R., & Ellwein, L. B. (2000) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00453-5 · Cited by 447
Self-citationRefractive error study in children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey
Negrel, A. D., Maul, E., Pokharel, G. P., Zhao, J., & Ellwein, L. B. (2000) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00455-9 · Cited by 365
Self-citationMyopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: a three-year follow-up study.
Pärssinen, O., & Lyyra, A.-L. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 264
Lam, C. S. Y., Edwards, M. H., Millodot, M., & Goh, W. S. H. (1999) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1999.tb05416.x · Cited by 152
Temporal Variations in Myopia Progression in Singaporean Children within an Academic Year
Tan, N., Saw, S., Lam, D. S. C., Cheng, H., Rajan, U., & Chew, S. (2000) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.2000.tb01169.x · Cited by 127
Zhang, M., Saw, S., Hong, R.-Z., Fu, Z.-F., Yang, H., Shui, Y., Yap, M. K. H., & Chew, S. (2000) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.2000.tb01102.x · Cited by 106
Cited by
The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention
Morgan, I. G., French, A. N., Ashby, R. S., Guo, X., Ding, X., He, M., & Rose, K. A. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004 · Cited by 1,310
Self-citationTime outdoors and the prevention of myopia
French, A. N., Ashby, R. S., Morgan, I. G., & Rose, K. A. (2013) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.018 · Cited by 395
Wu, P.-C., Huang, H.-M., Yu, H.-J., Fang, P.-C., & Chen, C.-T. (2016) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/apo.0000000000000236 · Cited by 357
Ma, X., Zhou, Z., Yi, H., Pang, X., Shi, Y., Chen, Q., Meltzer, M. E., le Cessie, S., He, M., Rozelle, S., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g5740 · Cited by 238
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- He, M., Zeng, J., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Pokharel, G. P., & Ellwein, L. B.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 793
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2034644592
- Cited by
- 788
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.