The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Quantification of Adult and Developing Mouse Spatial Vision Using a Virtual Optomotor System
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a simple, rapid method of quantifying the spatial vision of mice. METHODS: A rotating cylinder covered with a vertical sine wave grating was calculated and drawn in virtual three-dimensional (3-D) space on four computer monitors facing to form a square. C57BL/6 mice standing unrestrained on a platform in the center of the square tracked the grating with reflexive head and neck movements. The spatial frequency of the grating was clamped at the viewing position by repeatedly recentering the cylinder on the head. Acuity was quantified by increasing the spatial frequency of the grating until an optomotor response could not be elicited. Contrast sensitivity was measured at spatial frequencies between 0.03 and 0.35 cyc/deg. RESULTS: Grating acuity was measurable on the day of eye opening (postnatal day [P]15: mean acuity, 0.031 cyc/deg) and reached a maximum (approximately 0.4 cyc/deg) by P24. A peak in the contrast sensitivity function emerged on P16 (4.7, or 21% contrast at 0.064 cyc/deg). The peak remained at 0.064 cyc/deg and climbed to a maximum sensitivity of 24.5, or 4% contrast, by P29. Acuity was obtained in each mouse in <10 minutes, and a detailed contrast sensitivity curve was generated in approximately 30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual optomotor system provides a simple and precise method for rapidly quantifying mouse vision. Behavioral measures of vision in mice are essential for interpreting the results of experiments designed to reveal the cellular and molecular mechanisms of vision and visual development and for evaluating potential treatments for visual diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An animal model of age-related macular degeneration in senescent Ccl-2- or Ccr-2-deficient mice
Ambati, J., Anand, A., Fernandez, S., Sakurai, E., Lynn, B. C., Kuziel, W. A., Rollins, B. J., & Ambati, B. K. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm950 · Cited by 631
Cited by
Rapid innate defensive responses of mice to looming visual stimuli
Yilmaz, M., & Meister, M. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.015 · Cited by 611
A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains
Simon, M. M., Greenaway, S., White, J. K., Fuchs, H., Gailus-Durner, V., Wells, S., Sorg, T., Wong, K., Bedu, E., Cartwright, E. J., et al. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82 · Cited by 507
Werneburg, S., Jung, J., Kunjamma, R. B., Ha, S.-K., Luciano, N. J., Willis, C. M., Gao, G., Biscola, N. P., Havton, L. A., Crocker, S. J., et al. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.004 · Cited by 440
Cuenca, N., Fernández-Sánchez, L., Campello, L., Maneu, V., De la Villa, P., Lax, P., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.07.001 · Cited by 401
Rapamycin extends murine lifespan but has limited effects on aging
Neff, F., Flores-Dominguez, D., Ryan, D. P., Horsch, M., Schröder, S., Adler, T., Afonso, L. C., Aguilar-Pimentel, J. A., Becker, L., Garrett, L., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci67674 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Prusky, G. T., Alam, N. M., Beekman, S., & Douglas, R. M.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4611
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2055820698
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.