Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Involvement of Oxidative Stress on Corneal Epithelial Alterations in a Blink-Suppressed Dry Eye

Nakamura, Shigeru, Shibuya, Michiko, Nakashima, Hideo, Hisamura, Ryuji, Masuda, Nozomi, Imagawa, Tomohiro, Uehara, Masato, Tsubota, Kazuo·2007·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether oxidative stress is involved in the etiology of the corneal disorder in blink-suppressed dry eye in a clinically relevant in vivo rat model. METHODS: A series of treatments were performed under continuous exposure to low-humidity airflow. Rats were placed on a jogging board (JB) made of a plastic pipe for 7.5 h/d, and for 16.5 hours, they were placed in individual cages without a JB. This protocol was repeated for up to 30 days. Corneal surface alteration was evaluated by the score of punctate fluorescein staining. To assess oxidative stress status, the levels of damaged DNA, and the protein modification by reactive aldehydes in corneal epithelia were detected by immunohistochemistry, using 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, 4-hydroxynonenal- and malondialdehyde-specific antibodies. RESULTS: Significant increases in the fluorescein staining score were observed from days 1 to 30 compared with the initial value. The average score for the dry eye group was significantly increased compared with that for the nontreatment group at all time points throughout the experiment. Immunoreactivity of all oxidative stress markers increased in the dry eye treatment. Quantitative analysis of the positive-stained cells showed a significant increase in the number of positive cells after 10 and 30 days in the dry eye treatment group compared with the nontreatment group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a relationship between the accumulation of oxidative stress and the etiology of corneal epithelial alterations in blink-suppressed dry eye.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.06-1027

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Nakamura, S., Shibuya, M., Nakashima, H., Hisamura, R., Masuda, N., Imagawa, T., Uehara, M., & Tsubota, K.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2007-04-01
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1552
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W1967884767
Cited by
174
References
1
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Involvement of Oxidative Stress on Corneal Epithelial Alterations in a Blink-Suppressed Dry Eye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.06-1027
The paper
Nakamura, S., Shibuya, M., Nakashima, H., Hisamura, R., Masuda, N., Imagawa, T., Uehara, M., & Tsubota, K. (2007). Involvement of Oxidative Stress on Corneal Epithelial Alterations in a Blink-Suppressed Dry Eye. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-1027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.