Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In Vivo Human Choroidal Thickness Measurements: Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations

Open access
Brown, Jamin S., Flitcroft, D. Ian, Ying, Gui-shuang, Francis, Ellie L., Schmid, Gregor F., Quinn, Graham E., Stone, Richard A.·2009·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors applied partial coherence interferometry (PCI) to estimate the thickness of the human choroid in vivo and to learn whether it fluctuates during the day. METHODS: By applying signal processing techniques to existing PCI tracings of human ocular axial length measurements, a signal modeling algorithm was developed and validated to determine the position and variability of a postretinal peak that, by analogy to animal studies, likely corresponds to the choroidal/scleral interface. The algorithm then was applied to diurnal axial eye length datasets. RESULTS: The postretinal peak was identified in 28% of subjects in the development and validation datasets, with mean subfoveal choroidal thicknesses of 307 and 293 microm, respectively. Twenty-eight of 40 diurnal PCI datasets had at least two time points with identifiable postretinal peaks, yielding a mean choroidal thickness of 426 microm and a mean high-low difference in choroidal thickness of 59.5 +/- 24.2 microm (range, 25.9-103 microm). The diurnal choroidal thickness fluctuation was larger than twice the SE of measurement (24.5 microm) in 16 of these 28 datasets. Axial length and choroidal thickness tended to fluctuate in antiphase. CONCLUSIONS: Signal processing techniques provide choroidal thickness estimates in many, but not all, PCI datasets of axial eye measurements. Based on eyes with identifiable postretinal peaks at more than one time in a day, choroidal thickness varied over the day. Because of the established role of the choroid in retinal function and its possible role in regulating eye growth, further development and refinement of clinical methods to measure its thickness are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.08-1779

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Brown, J. S., Flitcroft, D. I., Ying, G.-S., Francis, E. L., Schmid, G. F., Quinn, G. E., & Stone, R. A.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
5
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W1986871879
Cited by
241
References
0
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Human Choroidal Thickness Measurements: Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.08-1779
The paper
Brown, J. S., Flitcroft, D. I., Ying, G.-S., Francis, E. L., Schmid, G. F., Quinn, G. E., & Stone, R. A. (2009). In Vivo Human Choroidal Thickness Measurements: Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-1779

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.