The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo Human Choroidal Thickness Measurements: Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The authors applied partial coherence interferometry (PCI) to estimate the thickness of the human choroid in vivo and to learn whether it fluctuates during the day. METHODS: By applying signal processing techniques to existing PCI tracings of human ocular axial length measurements, a signal modeling algorithm was developed and validated to determine the position and variability of a postretinal peak that, by analogy to animal studies, likely corresponds to the choroidal/scleral interface. The algorithm then was applied to diurnal axial eye length datasets. RESULTS: The postretinal peak was identified in 28% of subjects in the development and validation datasets, with mean subfoveal choroidal thicknesses of 307 and 293 microm, respectively. Twenty-eight of 40 diurnal PCI datasets had at least two time points with identifiable postretinal peaks, yielding a mean choroidal thickness of 426 microm and a mean high-low difference in choroidal thickness of 59.5 +/- 24.2 microm (range, 25.9-103 microm). The diurnal choroidal thickness fluctuation was larger than twice the SE of measurement (24.5 microm) in 16 of these 28 datasets. Axial length and choroidal thickness tended to fluctuate in antiphase. CONCLUSIONS: Signal processing techniques provide choroidal thickness estimates in many, but not all, PCI datasets of axial eye measurements. Based on eyes with identifiable postretinal peaks at more than one time in a day, choroidal thickness varied over the day. Because of the established role of the choroid in retinal function and its possible role in regulating eye growth, further development and refinement of clinical methods to measure its thickness are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia
Chakraborty, R., Ostrin, L. A., Nickla, D. L., Iuvone, P. M., Pardue, M. T., & Stone, R. A. (2018) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12453 · Cited by 235
Self-citationChenais, N. A. L., Airaghi Leccardi, M. J. I., & Ghezzi, D. (2021) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-021-00133-2 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. S., Flitcroft, D. I., Ying, G.-S., Francis, E. L., Schmid, G. F., Quinn, G. E., & Stone, R. A.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1986871879
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Human Choroidal Thickness Measurements: Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.08-1779
- The paper
- Brown, J. S., Flitcroft, D. I., Ying, G.-S., Francis, E. L., Schmid, G. F., Quinn, G. E., & Stone, R. A. (2009). In Vivo Human Choroidal Thickness Measurements: Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-1779
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.