The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Relation to Sex and Axial Length in 93 Danish University Students
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between subfoveal choroidal thickness and ocular axial length, refractive error, and blood pressure in healthy young women and men. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study of 93 eyes in 93 healthy Danish university students (mean age 24.9 ± 2.6 years). The submacular choroid was imaged using enhanced-depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured by visual inspection and manual fitting of the choroidal borderlines. Study parameters included history, best corrected visual acuity, objective refraction, interferometric ocular axial length, fundus photography, and blood pressure manometry. RESULTS: The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was 342 (±118) μm, the mean age was 24.9 (±2.6) years and the mean refractive error of participants was -1.43 (±2.9) diopters (D). In a multiple regression model, subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased by 58.2 μm (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.2-74.2 μm; P < 0.001) per mm increase in axial length adjusted for age and sex and subfoveal choroidal thickness was 62 μm (95% CI, 21-104 μm; P = 0.0039) thicker in men than in women, adjusted for age and axial length. Arterial blood pressure had no statistical effect on subfoveal choroidal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of healthy young participants choroidal thickness was 18% higher in men than in women when adjusting for age and axial length. This observation may help explain the effect of sex in conditions related to choroidal thickness such as myopia, central serous chorioretinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In a Matter of Minutes, the Eye Can Know Which Way to Grow
Zhu, X., Park, T. W., Winawer, J., & Wallman, J. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0956 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent findings and new physiopathology hypothesis
Daruich, A., Matet, A., Dirani, A., Bousquet, E., Zhao, M., Farman, N., Jaisser, F., & Behar-Cohen, F. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.05.003 · Cited by 989
Tan, C. S., Ouyang, Y., Ruiz, H., & Sadda, S. R. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8782 · Cited by 784
Optical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond
Mrejen, S., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X. Q., Larsen, M., & Munch, I. C.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2011-10-31
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 8438
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2072946112
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Relation to Sex and Axial Length in 93 Danish University Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.11-8108
- The paper
- Li, X. Q., Larsen, M., & Munch, I. C. (2011). Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Relation to Sex and Axial Length in 93 Danish University Students. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.