The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validating Retinal Fundus Image Analysis Algorithms: Issues and a Proposal
Open accessAbstract
This paper concerns the validation of automatic retinal image analysis (ARIA) algorithms. For reasons of space and consistency, we concentrate on the validation of algorithms processing color fundus camera images, currently the largest section of the ARIA literature. We sketch the context (imaging instruments and target tasks) of ARIA validation, summarizing the main image analysis and validation techniques. We then present a list of recommendations focusing on the creation of large repositories of test data created by international consortia, easily accessible via moderated Web sites, including multicenter annotations by multiple experts, specific to clinical tasks, and capable of running submitted software automatically on the data stored, with clear and widely agreed-on performance criteria, to provide a fair comparison.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms
Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1014573219977 · Cited by 6,740
Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.825627 · Cited by 4,202
A Steady-Hand Robotic System for Microsurgical Augmentation
Taylor, R., Jensen, P., Whitcomb, L., Barnes, A., Kumar, R., Stoianovici, D., Gupta, P., Wang, Z., Dejuan, E., & Kavoussi, L. (1999) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783649922067807 · Cited by 528
Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods
Rutjes, A., Reitsma, J., Coomarasamy, A., Khan, K., & Bossuyt, P. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11500 · Cited by 524
Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent and Control Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review
Li, R., Zhang, P., Barker, L. E., Chowdhury, F. M., & Zhang, X. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0843 · Cited by 491
Saaddine, J. B. (2008) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.126.12.1740 · Cited by 377
Cited by
Abràmoff, M. D., Lou, Y., Erginay, A., Clarida, W., Amelon, R., Folk, J. C., & Niemeijer, M. (2016) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19964 · Cited by 1,101
Self-citationOrlando, J. I., Fu, H., Barbosa Breda, J., van Keer, K., Bathula, D. R., Diaz-Pinto, A., Fang, R., Heng, P.-A., Kim, J., Lee, J., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101570 · Cited by 855
Screening for diabetic retinopathy: new perspectives and challenges
Vujosevic, S., Aldington, S. J., Silva, P., Hernández, C., Scanlon, P., Peto, T., & Simó, R. (2020) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30411-5 · Cited by 671
An ensemble deep learning based approach for red lesion detection in fundus images
Orlando, J. I., Prokofyeva, E., del Fresno, M., & Blaschko, M. B. (2018) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.017 · Cited by 293
Pellegrini, E., Ballerini, L., Hernandez, M. D. C. V., Chappell, F. M., González‐Castro, V., Anblagan, D., Danso, S., Muñoz‐Maniega, S., Job, D., Pernet, C., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2018.07.004 · Cited by 292
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Trucco, E., Ruggeri, A., Karnowski, T., Giancardo, L., Chaum, E., Hubschman, J. P., al-Diri, B., Cheung, C. Y., Wong, D., Abràmoff, M., Lim, G., Kumar, D., Burlina, P., Bressler, N. M., Jelinek, H. F., Meriaudeau, F., Quellec, G., MacGillivray, T., & Dhillon, B.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2013-05-24
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3546
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2095405787
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
