The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digoxin intoxication: the relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration
Open accessAbstract
A radioimmunoassay for serum digoxin concentration has been used to study the interrelationships of circulating levels of the drug and various factors in the clinical setting in 48 hospitalized patients with cardiac rhythm disturbances due to digoxin intoxication. 131 patients on maintenance doses of digoxin without toxicity and 48 patients with equivocal evidence of digoxin excess were also studied and compared with the toxic group. Patients with cardiac rhythm disturbances due to digoxin intoxication tended to be older and to have diminished renal function compared with the nontoxic group; body weight, serum potassium concentration, underlying cardiac rhythm, and nature of cardiac disease were not significantly different for the groups as a whole. Despite comparable mean daily digoxin dosages, digoxin intoxicated patients had a mean serum digoxin concentration of 3.7 +/-1.0 (SD) ng/ml, while nontoxic patients had a mean level of 1.4 +/-0.7 ng/ml (P < 0.001), 90% of patients without evidence of toxicity had serum digoxin concentrations of 2.0 ng/ml or less, while 87% of the toxic group had levels above 2.0; the range of overlap between the two groups extended from 1.6 to 3.0 ng/ml. Patients with atrioventricular block as their principal toxic manifestation had a significantly lower mean serum digoxin concentration than those in whom ectopic impulse formation was the chief rhythm disturbance. Patients with equivocal evidence of digoxin excess had received comparable daily maintenance doses of digoxin but had a mean serum concentration of 1.9 +/-0.8 ng/ml, intermediate between those of the nontoxic (P < 0.005) and toxic (P < 0.001) groups. Renal function as judged by mean blood urea nitrogen concentration was also intermediate. The data indicate that knowledge of the serum digoxin concentration, weighed in the clinical context, is useful in the management of patients receiving this drug.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reversal of Advanced Digoxin Intoxication with Fab Fragments of Digoxin-Specific Antibodies
Smith, T. W., Haber, E., Yeatman, L., & Butler, V. P. (1976) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197604082941501 · Cited by 377
Self-citationDigitalis: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Use
Epstein, F. H., & Smith, T. W. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198802113180606 · Cited by 346
Self-citationIncreased sensitivity to nitrazepam in old age
Castleden, C. M., George, C. F., Marcer, D., & Hallett, C. (1977) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6052.10 · Cited by 320
Malm-Erjefält, M., Ekblom, M., Vouis, J., Zdravkovic, M., & Lennernäs, H. (2015) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00278 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, T. W., & Haber, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1970-12-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2377-2386
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002943458
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 137.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digoxin intoxication: the relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci106457
- The paper
- Smith, T. W., & Haber, E. (1970). Digoxin intoxication: the relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.