Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Helicobacter pylori strain-specific differences in genetic content, identified by microarray, influence host inflammatory responses

Open access
Israel, Dawn A., Salama, Nina, Arnold, Carrie N., Moss, Steven F., Ando, Takafumi, Wirth, Hans-Peter, Tham, Kyi T., Camorlinga, Margorita, Blaser, Martin J., Falkow, Stanley, Peek, Richard M.·2001·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori enhances the risk for ulcer disease and gastric cancer, yet only a minority of H. pylori-colonized individuals develop disease. We examined the ability of two H. pylori isolates to induce differential host responses in vivo or in vitro, and then used an H. pylori whole genome microarray to identify bacterial determinants related to pathogenesis. Gastric ulcer strain B128 induced more severe gastritis, proliferation, and apoptosis in gerbil mucosa than did duodenal ulcer strain G1.1, and gastric ulceration and atrophy occurred only in B128+ gerbils. In vitro, gerbil-passaged B128 derivatives significantly increased IL-8 secretion and apoptosis compared with G1.1 strains. DNA hybridization to the microarray identified several strain-specific differences in gene composition including a large deletion of the cag pathogenicity island in strain G1.1. Partial and complete disruption of the cag island in strain B128 attenuated induction of IL-8 in vitro and significantly decreased gastric inflammation in vivo. These results indicate that the ability of H. pylori to regulate epithelial cell responses related to inflammation depends on the presence of an intact cag pathogenicity island. Use of an H pylori whole genome microarray is an effective method to identify differences in gene content between H. pylori strains that induce distinct pathological outcomes in a rodent model of H. pylori infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci11450

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Israel, D. A., Salama, N., Arnold, C. N., Moss, S. F., Ando, T., Wirth, H.-P., Tham, K. T., Camorlinga, M., Blaser, M. J., Falkow, S., & Peek, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
611-620
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006965406
Cited by
336
References
3
FWCI
32.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Helicobacter pylori strain-specific differences in genetic content, identified by microarray, influence host inflammatory responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci11450
The paper
Israel, D. A., Salama, N., Arnold, C. N., Moss, S. F., Ando, T., Wirth, H.-P., Tham, K. T., Camorlinga, M., Blaser, M. J., Falkow, S., & Peek, R. M. (2001). Helicobacter pylori strain-specific differences in genetic content, identified by microarray, influence host inflammatory responses. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci11450

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.