Cited by 151

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overexpression of human low density lipoprotein receptors leads to accelerated catabolism of Lp(a) lipoprotein in transgenic mice.

Hofmann, S L, Eaton, D L, Brown, M S, McConathy, W J, Goldstein, J L, Hammer, R E·1990·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci114602

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of mice catabolism of exogenous human Lp(a) have yielded mixed results, with some demonstrating LDLR-dependent and some LDLR-independent clearance.

    “Although mice do not produce endogenous Lp(a), studies of their catabolism of exogenous human Lp(a) have also yielded mixed results, with some demonstrating LDLR-dependent35,36 and some LDLR-independent25,32 clearance.”
  • Multiple studies of LDLR in cells, animal models, and humans have provided inconsistent or conflicting results.

    “Multiple studies of the LDL receptor (LDLR) in cells27-34, animal models25,32,35,36, and humans10,28,37-48 have provided inconsistent or conflicting results.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Utermann, G., F. Hoppichler, H. Dieplinger, M. Seed, G. Thompson, and E. Boerwinkle. 1989. Defects in the low density lipo- protein receptor gene affect lipoprotein (a) levels: multiplicative inter- action oftwo gene loci associated with premature atherosclerosis. Proc. NatL. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:4171-4174.
  2. Goldstein, J. L., S. E. Dana, and M. S. Brown. 1974. Esterifica- tion of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in human fibroblasts and its absence in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 7 1:4288-4292.
  3. Innerarity, T. L., K. H. Weisgraber, K. S. Arnold, R. W. Mah- ley, R. M. Krauss, G. L. Vega, and S. M. Grundy. 1987. Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: Low density lipoproteins with abnor- mal receptor binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:6919-6923.
  4. Soria, L. F., E. H. Ludwig, H. R. G. Clarke, G. L. Vega, S. M. Grundy, and B. J. McCarthy. 1989. Association between a specific apolipoprotein B mutation and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:587-591.
  5. Jackson, R. L. 1984. Lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase. In The Enzymes. P. D. Boyer, editor. Academic Press, New York. 141-181.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hofmann, S. L., Eaton, D. L., Brown, M. S., McConathy, W. J., Goldstein, J. L., & Hammer, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1990-05-01
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
1542-1547
ISSN
0021-9738
Cited by
151
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review