The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Previously undetected human hematopoietic cell populations with short-term repopulating activity selectively engraft NOD/SCID-β2 microglobulin–null mice
Open accessAbstract
Increasing use of purified or cultured human hematopoietic cells as transplants has revealed an urgent need for better methods to predict the speed and durability of their engraftment potential. We now show that NOD/SCID-beta2 microglobulin-null (NOD/SCID-beta2m-/-) mice are sequentially engrafted by two distinct and previously unrecognized populations of transplantable human short-term repopulating hematopoietic cells (STRCs), neither of which efficiently engraft NOD/SCID mice. One is predominantly CD34+CD38+ and is myeloid-restricted; the other is predominantly CD34+CD38- and has broader lymphomyeloid differentiation potential. In contrast, the long-term repopulating human cells that generate lymphoid and myeloid progeny in NOD/SCID mice engraft and self-renew in NOD/SCID-beta2m-/- mice equally efficiently. In short-term expansion cultures of adult bone marrow cells, myeloid-restricted STRCs were preferentially amplified (greater than tenfold) and, interestingly, both types of STRC were found to be selectively elevated in mobilized peripheral blood harvests. These results suggest an enhanced sensitivity of STRCs to natural killer cell-mediated rejection. They also provide new in vivo assays for different types of human STRC that may help to predict the engraftment potential of clinical transplants and facilitate future investigation of early stages of human hematopoietic stem cell differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages
Akashi, K., Traver, D., Miyamoto, T., & Weissman, I. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35004599 · Cited by 2,617
Identification of Clonogenic Common Lymphoid Progenitors in Mouse Bone Marrow
Kondo, M., Weissman, I. L., & Akashi, K. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80453-5 · Cited by 2,253
Cited by
Hematopoiesis: a human perspective
Doulatov, S., Notta, F., Laurenti, E., & Dick, J. E. (2012) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.006 · Cited by 895
Bowie, M. B., McKnight, K. D., Kent, D. G., McCaffrey, L., Hoodless, P. A., & Eaves, C. J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci28310 · Cited by 380
Self-citationHess, D. A., Meyerrose, T. E., Wirthlin, L., Craft, T. P., Herrbrich, P. E., Creer, M. H., & Nolta, J. A. (2004) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2004-02-0448 · Cited by 351
Distinct types of tumor-initiating cells form human colon cancer tumors and metastases
Dieter, S. M., Ball, C. R., Hoffmann, C. M., Nowrouzi, A., Herbst, F., Zavidij, O., Abel, U., Arens, A., Weichert, W., Brand, K., et al. (2011) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.08.010 · Cited by 297
Self-citationFeuring-Buske, M., Gerhard, B., Cashman, J., Humphries, R. K., Eaves, C. J., & Hogge, D. E. (2003) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2402882 · Cited by 116
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Glimm, H., Eisterer, W., Lee, K., Cashman, J., Holyoake, T. L., Nicolini, F., Shultz, L. D., von Kalle, C., & Eaves, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-206
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016146452
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Previously undetected human hematopoietic cell populations with short-term repopulating activity selectively engraft NOD/SCID-β2 microglobulin–null mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci11519
- The paper
- Glimm, H., Eisterer, W., Lee, K., Cashman, J., Holyoake, T. L., Nicolini, F., Shultz, L. D., von Kalle, C., & Eaves, C. J. (2001). Previously undetected human hematopoietic cell populations with short-term repopulating activity selectively engraft NOD/SCID-β2 microglobulin–null mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci11519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.