Cited by 346CAR-T cell therapy researchImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

CD19 CAR T cell product and disease attributes predict leukemia remission durability

Open access
Finney, Olivia C., Brakke, Hannah, Rawlings-Rhea, Stephanie, Hicks, Roxana, Doolittle, Danielle, Lopez, Marisa, Futrell, Ben, Orentas, Rimas J. +3 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can induce remission in highly refractory leukemia and lymphoma subjects, yet the parameters for achieving sustained relapse-free survival are not fully delineated. METHODS: We analyzed 43 pediatric and young adult subjects participating in a Phase I trial of defined composition CD19CAR T cells (NCT02028455). CAR T cell phenotype, function and expansion, as well as starting material T cell repertoire, were analyzed in relation to therapeutic outcome (defined as achieving complete remission within 63 days) and duration of leukemia free survival and B cell aplasia. RESULTS: These analyses reveal that initial therapeutic failures (n = 5) were associated with attenuated CAR T cell expansion and/or rapid attrition of functional CAR effector cells following adoptive transfer. The CAR T products were similar in phenotype and function when compared to products resulting in sustained remissions. However, the initial apheresed peripheral blood T cells could be distinguished by an increased frequency of LAG-3+/TNF-αlow CD8 T cells and, following adoptive transfer, the rapid expression of exhaustion markers. For the 38 subjects who achieved an initial sustained MRD-neg remission, remission durability correlated with therapeutic products having increased frequencies of TNF-α-secreting CAR CD8+ T cells, and was dependent on a sufficiently high CD19+ antigen load at time of infusion to trigger CAR T cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: These parameters have the potential to prospectively identify patients at risk for therapeutic failure and support the development of approaches to boost CAR T cell activation and proliferation in patients with low levels of CD19 antigen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02028455. FUNDING: Partial funding for this study was provided by Stand Up to Cancer & St. Baldrick's Pediatric Dream Team Translational Research Grant (SU2C-AACR-DT1113), RO1 CA136551-05, Alex Lemonade Stand Phase I/II Infrastructure Grant, Conquer Cancer Foundation Career Development Award, Washington State Life Sciences Discovery Fund, Ben Towne Foundation, William Lawrence & Blanche Hughes Foundation, and Juno Therapeutics, Inc., a Celgene Company.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci125423

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The composition of autologous starting material from cancer patients is highly variable, influenced by patient age and defects due to underlying disease or pre-treatment with lymphotoxic agents.

    “However, the composition of autologous starting material from cancer patients is highly variable, influenced by patient age and defects due to underlying disease or pre-treatment with lymphotoxic agents (35-38).”

    From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results describe differences in apheresis starting-material T cells among pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory ALL and compared with healthy donors. The Discussion suggests that recent cytotoxic therapy may contribute to T-cell damage, but does not establish that patient age or underlying disease independently determines starting-material composition. The claim also generalizes this pediatric ALL finding to cancer patients broadly. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. von Stackelberg A, et al. Phase I/phase II study of blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leuke- mia. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(36):4381-4389. · DOI
  2. Kantarjian H, et al. Results of inotuzumab ozoga- micin, a CD22 monoclonal antibody, in refrac- tory and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2013;119(15):2728-2736. · DOI
  3. Annesley CE, Summers C, Ceppi F, Gardner RA. The evolution and future of CAR T cells for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(4):591-598. · DOI
  4. Huang MA, Krishnadas DK, Lucas KG. Cellular and antibody based approaches for pediatric cancer immunotherapy. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:675269.
  5. Bautista F, Van der Lugt J, Kearns PR, Mussai FJ, Zwaan CM, Moreno L. The development of targeted new agents to improve the outcome for children with leukemia. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2016;11(11):1111-1122. · DOI
  6. Turtle CJ, et al. CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(6):2123-2138. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gardner RA, et al. Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. Blood. 2017;129(25):3322-3331.
  8. Park JH, Geyer MB, Brentjens RJ. CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapeutics for hematologic malig- nancies: interpreting clinical outcomes to date. Blood. 2016;127(26):3312-3320. · DOI
  9. Singh N, Frey NV, Grupp SA, Maude SL. CAR T cell therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and potential for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016;17(6):28. · DOI
  10. Singh N, Perazzelli J, Grupp SA, Barrett DM. Early memory phenotypes drive T cell proliferation in patients with pediatric malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(320):320ra3. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wang X, et al. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood. 2011;118(5):1255-1263. · DOI
  12. Sommermeyer D, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor- modified T cells derived from defined CD8+ and CD4+ subsets confer superior antitumor reactivity in vivo. Leukemia. 2016;30(2):492-500. · DOI
  13. Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR. Adoptive transfer of effec- tor CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(1):294-305. · DOI
  14. Xu Y, et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. Blood. 2014;123(24):3750-3759. · DOI
  15. Klaver Y, van Steenbergen SC, Sleijfer S, Debets R, Lamers CH. T cell maturation stage prior to and during GMP processing informs on CAR T cell expansion in patients. Front Immunol. 2016;7:648.
  16. Oliveira G, et al. Tracking genetically engineered lymphocytes long-term reveals the dynamics of T cell immunological memory. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(317):317ra198. · DOI
  17. Hudecek M, et al. The nonsignaling extracellular spacer domain of chimeric antigen receptors is decisive for in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(2):125-135. · DOI
  18. Neelapu SS, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531-2544. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Maude SL, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):439-448. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Rudolph MG, Stanfield RL, Wilson IA. How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:419-466. · DOI
  21. Fraietta JA, et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leu- kemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):563-571. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rossi J, et al. Preinfusion polyfunctional anti- CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells are associated with clinical outcomes in NHL. Blood. 2018;132(8):804-814.
  23. Sen DR, et al. The epigenetic landscape of T cell exhaustion. Science. 2016;354(6316):1165-1169. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Komada Y, et al. Cellular immunosuppression in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: effect of consolidation chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1992;35(4):271-276. · DOI
  25. Mackall CL, et al. Lymphocyte depletion during treatment with intensive chemotherapy for can- cer. Blood. 1994;84(7):2221-2228.
  26. Haining WN, et al. Antigen-specific T-cell memory is preserved in children treated for acute lympho- blastic leukemia. Blood. 2005;106(5):1749-1754. · DOI
  27. Ogonek J, et al. Immune reconstitution after allo- geneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:507.
  28. Wang X, Berger C, Wong CW, Forman SJ, Riddell SR, Jensen MC. Engraftment of human central memory-derived effector CD8+ T cells in immuno- deficient mice. Blood. 2011;117(6):1888-1898. · DOI
  29. Berger C, et al. Safety of targeting ROR1 in pri- mates with chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(2):206-216. · DOI
  30. Cooper LJN, et al. Enhanced antilymphoma effi- cacy of CD19-redirected influenza MP1-specific CTLs by cotransfer of T cells modified to present influenza MP1. Blood. 2005;105(4):1622-1631. · DOI
  31. Fry TJ, et al. CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy. Nat Med. 2017;24(1):20-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finney, O. C., Brakke, H., Rawlings-Rhea, S., Hicks, R., Doolittle, D., Lopez, M., Futrell, B., Orentas, R. J., Li, D., Gardner, R., & Jensen, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • Juno Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Michael C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
2123-2132
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2921866483
Cited by
346
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stand Up To Cancer and St Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team (SU2C-AACR-DT1113)
  • NIH (RO1 CA136551-05)
  • Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer (Phase I/II Infrastructure Grant)
  • Conquer Cancer Foundation (Career Development Award)
  • Washington State Life Sciences Discovery Fund (9721159)
  • Ben Towne Foundation (donation)
  • William Lawrence & Blanche Hughes Foundation (donation)
  • Juno Therapeutics, Inc., a Celgene Company (SRA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
CD19 CAR T cells, relapse-free survival, pediatric and young adult leukemia, CAR-T cell expansion, T cell exhaustion, LAG-3, TNF-α, CD8+ T cells, minimal residual disease, B-cell aplasia, adoptive T cell therapy, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Lymphocyte Activation Gene 3 Protein, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Leukemia, Lymphocyte Activation, Male, Phenotype, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Antigens, CD, Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic, Immunophenotyping, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Disease-Free Survival, Antigens, CD19, K562 Cells, Cell Proliferation, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review