Cited by 253Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune Responsesinterferon and immune responses

cGAS/STING axis mediates a topoisomerase II inhibitor–induced tumor immunogenicity

Open access
Wang, Zining, Chen, Jiemin, Hu, Jie, Zhang, Hongxia, Xu, Feifei, He, Wenzhuo, Wang, Xiaojuan, Li, Mengyun +8 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Checkpoint blockade antibodies have been approved as immunotherapy for multiple types of cancer, but the response rate and efficacy are still limited. There are few immunogenic cell death (ICD)-inducing drugs available that can kill cancer cells, enhance tumor immunogenicity, increase the in vivo immune infiltration, and thereby boosting a tumor response to immunotherapy. So far, the ICD markers have been identified as the few immuno-stimulating characteristics of dead cells, but whether the presence of such ICD markers on tumor cells translates into enhanced antitumor immunity in vivo is still investigational. To identify anticancer drugs that could induce tumor cell death and boost T cell response, we performed drug screenings based on both an ICD reporter assay and T cell activation assay. We identified that teniposide, a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor, could induce high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) release and type I interferon signaling in tumor cells, and teniposide-treated tumor cells could activate antitumor T cell response both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, teniposide induced tumor cell DNA damage and innate immune signaling including NF-κB activation and STING-dependent type I interferon signaling, both of which contribute to the activation of dendritic cells and subsequent T cells. Furthermore, teniposide potentiated the antitumor efficacy of anti-PD1 on multiple types of mouse tumor models. Our findings showed that teniposide could trigger tumor immunogenicity, and enabled a potential chemo-immunotherapeutic approach to potentiate the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci127471

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tumor cell-intrinsic STING activity is an important contributor to antitumor immune responses.

    “recent studies have provided compelling evidence that tumor cell-intrinsic STING activity is also an important contributor34–36.”

    From Epigenetic state determines the in vivo efficacy of STING agonist therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    The available passage (article header, no page number) gives the title, which links cGAS/STING to drug-induced tumor immunogenicity, but it contains no findings about tumor cell-intrinsic STING activity or antitumor immune responses. Searches for those terms returned only the header, so the decisive article text appears to be missing from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Chen, J., Hu, J., Zhang, H., Xu, F., He, W., Wang, X., Li, M., Lu, W., Zeng, G., Zhou, P., Huang, P., Chen, S., Li, W., Xia, L.-P., & Xia, X.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute (CN)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2019-10-07
Volume
129
Issue
11
Pages
4850-4862
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2968331746
Cited by
253
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472578, 81773051, 81803005, 81572409, 2018YFC1313300)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
Keywords
teniposide, topoisomerase II inhibitors, immunogenic cell death, cGAS-STING pathway, HMGB1 release, type I interferon signaling, NF-κB activation, dendritic cell activation, antitumor T-cell responses, anti-PD-1 therapy, chemoimmunotherapy, DNA damage, tumor immunogenicity
MeSH terms
STING Protein, Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Animals, Female, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Experimental, Nucleotidyltransferases, T-Lymphocytes, Teniposide, Signal Transduction, Mice, Knockout, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Topoisomerase II Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review