Cited by 590interferon and immune responsesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Deregulation of STING Signaling in Colorectal Carcinoma Constrains DNA Damage Responses and Correlates With Tumorigenesis

Open access
Xia, Tianli, Konno, Hiroyasu, Ahn, Jeonghyun, Barber, Glen N.·2016·Cell Reports

Abstract

Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) has been shown to be critical for controlling antiviral responses as well as anti-tumor adaptive immunity, but little is known regarding its regulation in human tumors. Here, we report that STING signaling is recurrently suppressed in a wide variety of cancers, including colorectal carcinoma. Loss of STING signaling impeded DNA damage responses accountable for generating key cytokines that facilitate tissue repair and anti-tumor T cell priming, such as type I interferons (IFNs). Correspondingly, defective STING function was also highly predictive of effectual DNA-virus-mediated oncolytic activity. Thus, impaired STING responses may enable damaged cells to evade host immunosurveillance processes, although they provide a critical prognostic measurement that could help predict the outcome of effective oncoviral therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.029

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cancer cells often inactivate the cGAS-STING pathway to evade immune detection.

    “Accordingly, cancer cells often inactivate the cGAS-STING pathway to evade immune detection (Xia et al., 2016).”

    From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Xia et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, T., Konno, H., Ahn, J., & Barber, G. N.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Barber, Glen N.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
282-297
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2220279767
Cited by
589
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health Systems
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA194404)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI079336)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
STING signaling, colorectal cancer, DNA damage response, type I interferon, tumor surveillance, DNA viruses, carcinogenesis, prognostic factors, tissue repair
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA Damage, Humans, Transfection, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Mice, Carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review