Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 130

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CD19-targeting CAR T cell immunotherapy outcomes correlate with genomic modification by vector integration

Nobles, Christopher L., Sherrill-Mix, Scott, Everett, John K., Reddy, Shantan, Fraietta, Joseph A., Porter, David L., Frey, Noelle, Gill, Saar I., Grupp, Stephan A., Maude, Shannon L., Siegel, Donald L., Levine, Bruce L., June, Carl H., Lacey, Simon F., Melenhorst, J. Joseph, Bushman, Frederic D.·2019·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells targeting CD19 (CART19) provide an effective treatment for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia but are less effective for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), focusing attention on improving efficacy. CART19 harbor an engineered receptor, which is delivered through lentiviral vector integration, thereby marking cell lineages and modifying the cellular genome by insertional mutagenesis. We recently reported that vector integration within the host TET2 gene was associated with CLL remission. Here, we investigated clonal population structure and therapeutic outcomes in another 39 patients by high-throughput sequencing of vector-integration sites. Genes at integration sites enriched in responders were commonly found in cell-signaling and chromatin modification pathways, suggesting that insertional mutagenesis in these genes promoted therapeutic T cell proliferation. We also developed a multivariate model based on integration-site distributions and found that data from preinfusion products forecasted response in CLL successfully in discovery and validation cohorts and, in day 28 samples, reported responders to CLL therapy with high accuracy. These data clarify how insertional mutagenesis can modulate cell proliferation in CART19 therapy and how data on integration-site distributions can be linked to treatment outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci130144

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 130

Metadata

Authors
Nobles, C. L., Sherrill-Mix, S., Everett, J. K., Reddy, S., Fraietta, J. A., Porter, D. L., Frey, N., Gill, S. I., Grupp, S. A., Maude, S. L., Siegel, D. L., Levine, B. L., June, C. H., Lacey, S. F., Melenhorst, J. J., & Bushman, F. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2019-12-17
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
673-685
ISSN
  • 0021-9738
  • 1558-8238
Cited by
130
References
73
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 CA009140, P01 CA214278, P30 CA016520, R01 CA226983, K08 CA194256, R01 AI082020, R01 AI117950, P30 AI045008)
  • Gabrielle’s Angel Foundation (--)
  • PennCHOP Microbiome Program (--)
  • Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research (000)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.