The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effector differentiation is not prerequisite for generation of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes
Open accessAbstract
The lineage relationship between short-lived effector T cells and long-lived memory cells is not fully understood. We have described T-GFP mice previously, in which naive and early activated T cells express GFP uniformly, whereas cells that have differentiated into effector cytotoxic T cells selectively lose GFP expression. Here we studied antigen-specific CD8 T cell differentiation using T-GFP mice crossed to the TCR transgenic (Tg) mice P14 (specific for the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein peptide, gp33-41). After activation with antigenic peptide, P14XT-GFP CD8(+) T cells cultured in high-dose IL-2 developed into cells with effector phenotype and function: they were blastoid, lost GFP expression, expressed high levels of activation and effector markers, and were capable of immediate cytotoxic function. In contrast, cells cultured in IL-15 or low-dose IL-2 never developed into full-fledged effector cells. Rather, they resembled memory cells: they were smaller, were GFP(+), did not express effector markers, and were incapable of immediate cytotoxicity. However, they mediated rapid-recall responses in vitro. After adoptive transfer, they survived in vivo for at least 10 weeks and mounted a secondary immune response after antigen rechallenge that was as potent as endogenously generated memory cells. In addition to providing a simple means to generate memory cells in virtually unlimited numbers, our results suggest that effector differentiation is not a prerequisite for memory cell generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Van Parijs, L., Refaeli, Y., Lord, J. D., Nelson, B. H., Abbas, A. K., & Baltimore, D. (1999) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80103-x · Cited by 423
RetractedBulfone‐Paus, S., Bulanova, E., Pohl, T., Budagian, V., Dürkop, H., Ruckert, R., Kunzendorf, U., Paus, R., & Krause, H. (1999) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.13.12.1575 · Cited by 153
RetractedTwo subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions
Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Förster, R., Lipp, M., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44385 · Cited by 5,846
Preferential Localization of Effector Memory Cells in Nonlymphoid Tissue
Masopust, D., Vezys, V., Marzo, A. L., & Lefrançois, L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058867 · Cited by 1,952
Counting Antigen-Specific CD8 T Cells: A Reevaluation of Bystander Activation during Viral Infection
Murali-Krishna, K., Altman, J. D., Suresh, M., Sourdive, D. J. D., Zajac, A. J., Miller, J. D., Slansky, J., & Ahmed, R. (1998) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80470-7 · Cited by 1,943
Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation
Ahmed, R., & Gray, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.54 · Cited by 1,775 · cited 1×
“The other view is that memory cells arise from naive cells when they receive weak antigenic stimulation toward the end of an immune response (21, 31).”
BackgroundInterleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naïve and memory CD8 T cells in vivo
Schluns, K. S., Kieper, W. C., Jameson, S. C., & Lefrançois, L. (2000) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/80868 · Cited by 1,618
Kaech, S. M., & Ahmed, R. (2001) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/87720 · Cited by 1,278
Potent and Selective Stimulation of Memory-Phenotype CD8+ T Cells In Vivo by IL-15
Zhang, X., Sun, S., Hwang, I., Tough, D. F., & Sprent, J. (1998) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80564-6 · Cited by 1,245
Interleukin-2 receptor α chain regulates the size and content of the peripheral lymphoid compartment
Willerford, D. M., Chen, J., Ferry, J. A., Davidson, L., Ma, A., & Alt, F. W. (1995) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/1074-7613(95)90180-9 · Cited by 1,080
Cited by
Central Memory and Effector Memory T Cell Subsets: Function, Generation, and Maintenance
Sallusto, F., Geginat, J., & Lanzavecchia, A. (2004) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104702 · Cited by 3,067
Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development
Kaech, S. M., Wherry, E. J., & Ahmed, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri778 · Cited by 1,865
Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets
Wherry, E. J., Teichgräber, V., Becker, T. C., Masopust, D., Kaech, S. M., Antia, R., von Andrian, U. H., & Ahmed, R. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni889 · Cited by 1,864
mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation
Araki, K., Turner, A. P., Shaffer, V. O., Gangappa, S., Keller, S. A., Bachmann, M. F., Larsen, C. P., & Ahmed, R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08155 · Cited by 1,575
Homeostasis of Naive and Memory T Cells
Surh, C. D., & Sprent, J. (2008) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.002 · Cited by 1,193
Metadata
- Authors
- Manjunath, N., Shankar, P., Wan, J., Weninger, W., Crowley, M. A., Hieshima, K., Springer, T. A., Fan, X., Shen, H., Lieberman, J., & von Andrian, U. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2001-09-15
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 871-878
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112552541
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effector differentiation is not prerequisite for generation of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci13296
- The paper
- Manjunath, N., Shankar, P., Wan, J., Weninger, W., Crowley, M. A., Hieshima, K., Springer, T. A., Fan, X., Shen, H., Lieberman, J., & von Andrian, U. H. (2001). Effector differentiation is not prerequisite for generation of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci13296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.