Cited by 347Animal testing and alternativesBiomedical Ethics and Regulation3D Printing in Biomedical Research

FDA modernization act 2.0: transitioning beyond animal models with human cells, organoids, and AI/ML-based approaches

Open access
Zushin, Peter-James H., Mukherjee, Souhrid, Wu, Joseph C.·2023·Journal of Clinical Investigation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci175824

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This focus aligns with broader regulatory developments, as reflected in the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 and 3.0, which promote the adoption of Organ-On-Chip (OOC) platforms and other New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) as alternatives to traditional animal testing.

    “This focus aligns with broader regulatory developments, as reflected in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act 2.0 and 3.0, which promote the adoption of Organ-On-Chip (OOC) platforms and other New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) as alternatives to traditional animal testing (Carratt et al., 2024; Zushin et al., 2023; Ahmed et al., 2023).”

    From Mini-hearts for disease modeling and drug testing – process optimization versus biological functionality (2026) · cites this paper as Zushin et al., 2023

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zushin, P.-J. H., Mukherjee, S., & Wu, J. C.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Joseph C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2023-11-01
Volume
133
Issue
21
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W4388079620
Cited by
347
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 147 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
105.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HL145676)
  • Stanford Bio-X
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL141371, R01HL145676, R01HL141851, R01HL130020, R01HL146690)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB009035)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
animal models, human cells, organoids, artificial intelligence, machine learning, drug regulation, alternative models, preclinical testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Organoids, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review