The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diabetic impairments in NO-mediated endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and homing are reversed by hyperoxia and SDF-1α
Open accessAbstract
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are essential in vasculogenesis and wound healing, but their circulating and wound level numbers are decreased in diabetes. This study aimed to determine mechanisms responsible for the diabetic defect in circulating and wound EPCs. Since mobilization of BM EPCs occurs via eNOS activation, we hypothesized that eNOS activation is impaired in diabetes, which results in reduced EPC mobilization. Since hyperoxia activates NOS in other tissues, we investigated whether hyperoxia restores EPC mobilization in diabetic mice through BM NOS activation. Additionally, we studied the hypothesis that impaired EPC homing in diabetes is due to decreased wound level stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha), a chemokine that mediates EPC recruitment in ischemia. Diabetic mice showed impaired phosphorylation of BM eNOS, decreased circulating EPCs, and diminished SDF-1alpha expression in cutaneous wounds. Hyperoxia increased BM NO and circulating EPCs, effects inhibited by the NOS inhibitor N-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester. Administration of SDF-1alpha into wounds reversed the EPC homing impairment and, with hyperoxia, synergistically enhanced EPC mobilization, homing, and wound healing. Thus, hyperoxia reversed the diabetic defect in EPC mobilization, and SDF-1alpha reversed the diabetic defect in EPC homing. The targets identified, which we believe to be novel, can significantly advance the field of diabetic wound healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Du, X. L., Edelstein, D., Dimmeler, S., Ju, Q., Sui, C., & Brownlee, M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci11235 · Cited by 907
Vascular dysfunction in diabetes mellitus
Feener, E. P., & King, G. L. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)90022-2 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Factors affecting wound healing
Guo, S., & DiPietro, L. A. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359125 · Cited by 5,792
Oxidative stress and diabetic complications
Giacco, F., & Brownlee, M. (2010) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.110.223545 · Cited by 5,461
Nunan, R., Harding, K. G., & Martin, P. (2014) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.016782 · Cited by 542
Stabilization of HIF-1α is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic mice
Botusan, I. R., Sunkari, V. G., Savu, O., Catrina, A. I., Grünler, J., Lindberg, S., Pereira, T., Ylä-Herttuala, S., Poellinger, L., Brismar, K., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805230105 · Cited by 533
Aging and disease as modifiers of efficacy of cell therapy
Dimmeler, S., & Leri, A. (2008) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.108.175943 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallagher, K. A., Liu, Z.-J., Xiao, M., Chen, H., Goldstein, L. J., Buerk, D. G., Nedeau, A., Thom, S. R., & Velazquez, O. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1249-1259
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168783417
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.