The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The p63/p73 network mediates chemosensitivity to cisplatin in a biologically defined subset of primary breast cancers
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancers lacking estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and Her2 amplification exhibit distinct gene expression profiles and clinical features, and they comprise the majority of BRCA1-associated tumors. Here we demonstrated that the p53 family member p63 controls a pathway for p73-dependent cisplatin sensitivity specific to these "triple-negative" tumors. In vivo, DeltaNp63 and TAp73 isoforms were coexpressed exclusively within a subset of triple-negative primary breast cancers that commonly exhibited mutational inactivation of p53. The DeltaNp63alpha isoform promoted survival of breast cancer cells by binding TAp73 and thereby inhibiting its proapoptotic activity. Consequently, inhibition of p63 by RNA interference led to TAp73-dependent induction of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members and apoptosis. Breast cancer cells expressing DeltaNp63alpha and TAp73 exhibited cisplatin sensitivity that was uniquely dependent on TAp73. Thus, in response to treatment with cisplatin, but not other chemotherapeutic agents, TAp73 underwent c-Abl-dependent phosphorylation, which promoted dissociation of the DeltaNp63alpha/TAp73 protein complex, TAp73-dependent transcription of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members, and apoptosis. These findings define p63 as a survival factor in a subset of breast cancers; furthermore, they provide what we believe to be a novel mechanism for cisplatin sensitivity in these triple-negative cancers, and they suggest that such cancers may share the cisplatin sensitivity of BRCA1-associated tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Martin, S. J., Reutelingsperger, C. P., McGahon, A. J., Rader, J. A., van Schie, R. C., LaFace, D. M., & Green, D. R. (1995) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.182.5.1545 · Cited by 2,824
Basu, S., Totty, N. F., Irwin, M. S., Sudol, M., & Downward, J. (2003) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00776-1 · Cited by 843
Cited by
Gain of function of mutant p53 by coaggregation with multiple tumor suppressors
Xu, J., Reumers, J., Couceiro, J. R., De Smet, F., Gallardo, R., Rudyak, S., Cornelis, A., Rozenski, J., Zwolinska, A., Marine, J.-C., et al. (2011) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.546 · Cited by 543
Maintaining epithelial stemness with p63
Melino, G., Memmi, E. M., Pelicci, P. G., & Bernassola, F. (2015) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaa1033 · Cited by 139
Repression of p63 and induction of EMT by mutant Ras in mammary epithelial cells
Yoh, K. E., Regunath, K., Guzman, A., Lee, S.-M., Pfister, N. T., Akanni, O., Kaufman, L. J., Prives, C., & Prywes, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613417113 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Leong, C.-O., Vidnovic, N., DeYoung, M. P., Sgroi, D., & Ellisen, L. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1370-1380
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022289852
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The p63/p73 network mediates chemosensitivity to cisplatin in a biologically defined subset of primary breast cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci30866
- The paper
- Leong, C.-O., Vidnovic, N., DeYoung, M. P., Sgroi, D., & Ellisen, L. W. (2007). The p63/p73 network mediates chemosensitivity to cisplatin in a biologically defined subset of primary breast cancers. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci30866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.