The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduced water permeability and altered ultrastructure in thin descending limb of Henle in aquaporin-1 null mice
Open accessAbstract
It has been controversial whether high water permeability in the thin descending limb of Henle (TDLH) is required for formation of a concentrated urine by the kidney. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy (FFEM) of rat TDLH has shown an exceptionally high density of intramembrane particles (IMPs), which were proposed to consist of tetramers of aquaporin-1 (AQP1) water channels. In this study, transepithelial osmotic water permeability (Pf) was measured in isolated perfused segments (0.5-1 mm) of TDLH in wild-type (+/+), AQP1 heterozygous (+/-), and AQP1 null (-/-) mice. Pf was measured at 37 degrees C using a 100 mM bath-to-lumen osmotic gradient of raffinose, and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran as the luminal volume marker. Pf was (in cm/s): 0.26 +/- 0.02 ([+/+]; SE, n = 9 tubules), 0.21 +/- 0.01 ([+/-]; n = 12), and 0.031 +/- 0.007 ([-/-]; n = 6) (P < 0.02, [+/+] vs. [+/-]; P < 0.0001, [+/+] vs. [-/-]). FFEM of kidney medulla showed remarkably fewer IMPs in TDLH from (-/-) vs. (+/+) and (+/-) mice. IMP densities were (in microm-2, SD, 5-12 micrographs): 5,880 +/- 238 (+/+); 5,780 +/- 450 (+/-); and 877 +/- 420 (-/-). IMP size distribution analysis revealed mean IMP diameters of 8.4 nm ([+/+] and [+/-]) and 5.2 nm ([-/-]). These results demonstrate that AQP1 is the principal water channel in TDLH and support the view that osmotic equilibration along TDLH by water transport plays a key role in the renal countercurrent concentrating mechanism. The similar Pf and AQP1 expression in TDLH of (+/+) and (+/-) mice was an unexpected finding that probably accounts for the unimpaired urinary concentrating ability in (+/-) mice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aquaporins in the Kidney: From Molecules to Medicine
Nielsen, S., Frøkiær, J., Marples, D., Kwon, T.-H., Agre, P., & Knepper, M. A. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00024.2001 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citationAquaporins: important but elusive drug targets
Verkman, A. S., Anderson, M. O., & Papadopoulos, M. C. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4226 · Cited by 586
Self-citationOshio, K., Watanabe, H., Song, Y., Verkman, A. S., & Manley, G. T. (2005) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.04-1711fje · Cited by 473
Self-citationAquaporins in Clinical Medicine
Verkman, A. S. (2012) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-043010-193843 · Cited by 388
Self-citationNovel roles of aquaporins revealed by phenotype analysis of knockout mice
Verkman, A. S. (2006) · Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/3-540-28217-3_2 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, C.-L., Knepper, M. A., Hoek, A. N. V., Brown, D., Yang, B., Ma, T., & Verkman, A. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1999-02-15
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 491-496
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020839799
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced water permeability and altered ultrastructure in thin descending limb of Henle in aquaporin-1 null mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci5704
- The paper
- Chou, C.-L., Knepper, M. A., Hoek, A. N. V., Brown, D., Yang, B., Ma, T., & Verkman, A. S. (1999). Reduced water permeability and altered ultrastructure in thin descending limb of Henle in aquaporin-1 null mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci5704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.