Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory

Open access
Lugli, Enrico, Dominguez, Maria H., Gattinoni, Luca, Chattopadhyay, Pratip K., Bolton, Diane L., Song, Kaimei, Klatt, Nichole R., Brenchley, Jason M., Vaccari, Monica, Gostick, Emma, Price, David A., Waldmann, Thomas A., Restifo, Nicholas P., Franchini, Genoveffa, Roederer, Mario·2013·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Long-lived memory T cells are able to persist in the host in the absence of antigen; however, the mechanism by which they are maintained is not well understood. Recently, a subset of human T cells, stem cell memory T cells (TSCM cells), was shown to be self-renewing and multipotent, thereby providing a potential reservoir for T cell memory throughout life. However, their in vivo dynamics and homeostasis still remain to be defined due to the lack of suitable animal models. We identified T cells with a TSCM phenotype and stem cell-like properties in nonhuman primates. These cells were the least-differentiated memory subset, were functionally distinct from conventional memory cells, and served as precursors of central memory. Antigen-specific TSCM cells preferentially localized to LNs and were virtually absent from mucosal surfaces. They were generated in the acute phase of viral infection, preferentially survived in comparison with all other memory cells following elimination of antigen, and stably persisted for the long term. Thus, one mechanism for maintenance of long-term T cell memory derives from the unique homeostatic properties of TSCM cells. Vaccination strategies designed to elicit durable cellular immunity should target the generation of TSCM cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci66327

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Lugli, E., Dominguez, M. H., Gattinoni, L., Chattopadhyay, P. K., Bolton, D. L., Song, K., Klatt, N. R., Brenchley, J. M., Vaccari, M., Gostick, E., Price, D. A., Waldmann, T. A., Restifo, N. P., Franchini, G., & Roederer, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2013-01-02
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
594-9
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090342830
Cited by
302
References
6
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci66327
The paper
Lugli, E., Dominguez, M. H., Gattinoni, L., Chattopadhyay, P. K., Bolton, D. L., Song, K., Klatt, N. R., Brenchley, J. M., Vaccari, M., Gostick, E., Price, D. A., Waldmann, T. A., Restifo, N. P., Franchini, G., & Roederer, M. (2013). Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci66327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.