Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In utero supplementation with methyl donors enhances allergic airway disease in mice

Open access
Hollingsworth, John W., Maruoka, Shuichiro, Boon, Kathy, Garantziotis, Stavros, Li, Zhuowei, Tomfohr, John, Bailey, Nathaniel, Potts, Erin N., Whitehead, Gregory, Brass, David M., Schwartz, David A.·2016·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Asthma is a complex heritable disease that is increasing in prevalence and severity, particularly in developed countries such as the United States, where 11% of the population is affected. The contribution of environmental and genetic factors to this growing epidemic is currently not well understood. We developed the hypothesis, based on previous literature, that changes in DNA methylation resulting in aberrant gene transcription may enhance the risk of developing allergic airway disease. Our findings indicate that in mice, a maternal diet supplemented with methyl donors enhanced the severity of allergic airway disease that was inherited transgenerationally. Using a genomic approach, we discovered 82 gene-associated loci that were differentially methylated after in utero supplementation with a methyl-rich diet. These methylation changes were associated with decreased transcriptional activity and increased disease severity. Runt-related transcription factor 3 (Runx3), a gene known to negatively regulate allergic airway disease, was found to be excessively methylated, and Runx3 mRNA and protein levels were suppressed in progeny exposed in utero to a high-methylation diet. Moreover, treatment with a demethylating agent increased Runx3 gene transcription, further supporting our claim that a methyl-rich diet can affect methylation status and consequent transcriptional regulation. Our findings indicate that dietary factors can modify the heritable risk of allergic airway disease through epigenetic mechanisms during a vulnerable period of fetal development in mice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci87742This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Hollingsworth, J. W., Maruoka, S., Boon, K., Garantziotis, S., Li, Z., Tomfohr, J., Bailey, N., Potts, E. N., Whitehead, G., Brass, D. M., & Schwartz, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2016-05-02
Volume
126
Issue
5
Pages
2012-2012
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2046498828
Cited by
428
References
5
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In utero supplementation with methyl donors enhances allergic airway disease in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci87742
The paper
Hollingsworth, J. W., Maruoka, S., Boon, K., Garantziotis, S., Li, Z., Tomfohr, J., Bailey, N., Potts, E. N., Whitehead, G., Brass, D. M., & Schwartz, D. A. (2016). In utero supplementation with methyl donors enhances allergic airway disease in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci87742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.