Cited by 485Birth, Development, and HealthNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Developmental origins of metabolic disease: Life course and intergenerational perspectives

Godfrey, Keith M., Gluckman, Peter D., Hanson, Mark A.·2010·Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Recent evidence demonstrates important maternal effects on an offspring's risk of developing metabolic disease. These effects extend across the full range of maternal environments and partly involve epigenetic mechanisms. The maternal effects can be explained in evolutionary terms, and there is some evidence for their transmission into succeeding generations. Unbalanced maternal diet or body composition, ranging from poor to rich environments, adversely influences the offspring's response to later challenges such as an obesogenic diet or physical inactivity, increasing the risk of disease. Adopting a life course approach that takes into account intergenerational effects has important implications for prevention of non-communicable diseases, particularly in populations undergoing rapid economic transition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.008

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Links between maternal obesity, excessive GWG, GDM or hyperglycaemia and hypertensive disorders and offspring BP, adiposity and glucose-insulin traits are supported by systematic reviews and large cohorts, whereas evidence that a specific placental phenotype mediates the long-term association is more limited.

    “Their links with offspring blood pressure (BP), adiposity and glucose–insulin traits are supported by systematic reviews and large cohorts, whereas evidence that a specific placental phenotype mediates the long-term association is more limited [27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godfrey, K. M., Gluckman, P. D., & Hanson, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hanson, Mark A.
Venue
Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
199-205
ISSN
1043-2760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007756733
Cited by
485
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 42
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (RG/07/009/23120)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
developmental origins of health and disease, metabolic disorders, maternal effects, intergenerational transmission, epigenetics, life course, maternal diet, maternal body composition, obesogenic diet, physical inactivity, non-communicable disease prevention, economic transition, evolutionary medicine
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Epigenesis, Genetic, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review