Cited by 622Climate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Extended Reconstruction of Global Sea Surface Temperatures Based on COADS Data (1854–1997)

Smith, Thomas M., Reynolds, Richard W.·2003·Journal of Climate

Abstract

A monthly extended reconstruction of global SST (ERSST) is produced based on Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Data Set (COADS) release 2 observations from the 1854–1997 period. Improvements come from the use of updated COADS observations with new quality control procedures and from improved reconstruction methods. In addition error estimates are computed, which include uncertainty from both sampling and analysis errors. Using this method, little global variance can be reconstructed before the 1880s because data are too sparse to resolve enough modes for that period. Error estimates indicate that except in the North Atlantic ERSST is of limited value before 1880, when the uncertainty of the near-global average is almost as large as the signal. In most regions, the uncertainty decreases through most of the period and is smallest after 1950. The large-scale variations of ERSST are broadly consistent with those associated with the Hadley Centre Global Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature (HadISST) reconstruction produced by the Met Office. There are differences due to both the use of different historical bias corrections as well as different data and analysis procedures, but these differences do not change the overall character of the SST variations. Procedures used here produce a smoother analysis compared to HadISST. The smoother ERSST has the advantage of filtering out more noise at the possible cost of filtering out some real variations when sampling is sparse. A rotated EOF ana…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/1520-0442-16.10.1495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analysis is restricted to the 1880-2010 period because ERSST is most reliable then.

    “We restrict our analysis to the 1880-2010 period, when ERSST is most reliable.”

    From Impacts of canonical and Modoki El Niño on tropical Atlantic SST (2014) · cites this paper as Smith and Reynolds, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, T. M., & Reynolds, R. W.
Affiliations
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (US)
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2003-05-15
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1495-1510
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2137582471
Cited by
622
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 30
FWCI
38.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
sea surface temperature reconstruction, ERSST, COADS, HadISST, sampling uncertainty, ENSO, sea surface temperature anomalies, North Atlantic SST, data sparsity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review