Cited by 49Calibration and Measurement TechniquesClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Evaluation of AATSR and TMI Satellite SST Data

Open access
Reynolds, Richard W., Gentemann, Chelle L., Corlett, Gary K.·2010·Journal of Climate

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate two satellite instruments for SST: the infrared (IR) Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) and the microwave (MW) Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Microwave Imager (TMI). Because of its dual view, AATSR has a potential for lower biases than other IR products such as the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), while the tropical TMI record was available for a longer period of time than the global MW instrument, the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR). The results show that the AATSR IR retrievals are good quality with biases lower than or as low as other satellite retrievals between 50°S and 50°N. Furthermore, the dual-view algorithm reduces the influence of aerosol contamination. However, the AATSR coverage is roughly half that of AVHRR. North of 50°N there appear to be biases and high variability in summer daytime retrievals, with smaller but consistent biases observed below 50°S. TMI data can significantly improve coverage offshore in regions where IR retrievals are reduced by cloud cover. However, TMI data have small-scale biases from land contamination that should be removed by modifying the land–sea mask to remove more coastal regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/2009jcli3252.1

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dust events not flagged as cloud can cause an artificial timescale in the SSTA correlation, which then appears as short-term SSTA persistence.

    “Where dust events are not flagged as cloud in the retrieval, they tend to bias the retrieved SST cold2,61,62 and can cause an artificial timescale in the SSTA correlation, which then appears as short-term SSTA persistence.”

    From Tendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    Section 3 (Data comparisons; page unavailable) reports that Saharan dust aerosols may bias infrared SST retrievals cold, with negative biases observed in AVHRR data. It does not establish that dust events escape cloud flagging or that they create an artificial timescale in SSTA correlations or apparent short-term persistence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This short-term SSTA persistence in the equatorial Atlantic west of Africa is an artefact of the SST data, where the retrieval is not robust to high concentrations of desert dust.

    “This is an artefact of the SST data, where the retrieval is not robust to high concentrations of desert dust.”

    From Tendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    Section 3 (page unavailable) reports that Saharan dust aerosols may cause cold biases in infrared SST retrievals in the tropical Atlantic, supporting the concern about dust-sensitive data. It does not identify the cited short-term SSTA persistence as an artefact, and it says microwave retrievals are unaffected by aerosols while AATSR can compensate for them. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Where dust events are not flagged as cloud in the retrieval, they tend to bias the retrieved SST cold.

    “Where dust events are not flagged as cloud in the retrieval, they tend to bias the retrieved SST cold2,61,62 and can cause an artificial timescale in the SSTA correlation, which then appears as short-term SSTA persistence.”

    From Tendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

    Section 3, “Data comparisons,” says Saharan dust aerosols may bias infrared SST retrievals cold and shows negative biases in AVHRR retrievals. It does not establish the claim’s condition that dust events were not flagged as cloud; it also notes that AATSR can compensate for aerosols and may instead show a small warm bias. The cited claim here is the cold-bias clause, not the sentence’s separate assertion about SSTA persistence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reynolds, R. W., Gentemann, C. L., & Corlett, G. K.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Remote Sensing Systems (United States) (US)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Richard W.
Venue
Journal of Climate
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
152-165
ISSN
  • 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0442
OpenAlex
W2000359037
Cited by
49
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Climate (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
sea surface temperature, AATSR, TRMM Microwave Imager, aerosol contamination, land contamination, land-sea mask, cloud cover, AVHRR, AMSR

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review