Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,266

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Quantification of Drought: An Evaluation of Drought Indices

Open access
Keyantash, John, Dracup, John A.·2002·Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Abstract

Indices for objectively quantifying the severity of meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological forms of drought are discussed. Indices for each drought form are judged according to six weighted evaluation criteria: robustness, tractability, transparency, sophistication, extendability, and dimensionality. The indices considered most promising for succinctly summarizing drought severity are computed for two climate divisions in Oregon for 24 water years, 1976–99. The assessment determined that the most valuable indices for characterizing meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts are rainfall deciles, total water deficit, and computed soil moisture, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1167

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,266

Metadata

Authors
Keyantash, J., & Dracup, J. A.
Venue
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Published
2002-08
Volume
83
Issue
8
Pages
1167-1180
ISSN
  • 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0477
OpenAlex
W2168633186
Cited by
1,266
References
0
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quantification of Drought: An Evaluation of Drought Indices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1167
The paper
Keyantash, J., & Dracup, J. A. (2002). The Quantification of Drought: An Evaluation of Drought Indices. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1167

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.