The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial Variation and Trends in PDSI and SPI Indices and Their Relation to Streamflow in 10 Large Regions of China
Abstract
Time series of the average annual Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) and standardized precipitation index (SPI) were calculated for 483 meteorological stations in China using monthly data from 1961 to 2005. The time series were analyzed for 10 large regions covering the territory of China and represented by seven river basins and three areas in the southeast, southwest, and northwest. Results show that the frequencies of both dry and wet years for the whole period are lower for southern basins than for the northern ones when estimated by PDSI but very similar for all basins when calculated by SPI. The frequencies of dry and wet years calculated for 5- and 15-yr subperiods by both indices show the upward dry trends for three northeastern basins, Songhuajiang, Liaohe, and Haihe; a downward dry trend for the northwest region; a downward wet trend for the Yellow River basin; and an upward wet trend for the northwest region. Trend detection using PDSI indicates statistically significant negative trends for many stations in the northeastern basins (Songhuajiang, Liaohe, Haihe, and Yellow) and in the middle part of the Yangtze, whereas statistically significant positive trends were found in the mountainous part of the northwest region and for some stations in the upper and lower Yangtze. A moderately high and statistically significant correlation between the percentage of runoff anomaly (PRA) and the annual average PDSI and SPI was found for six large rivers. The results confirm that PDSI and SPI indices can be used to describe the tendency of dryness and wetness severity and for comparison in climate impact assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drought under global warming: a review
Dai, A. (2011) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.81 · Cited by 3,523
Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Carrao, H., Barbosa, P., & Vogt, J. (2014) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3875 · Cited by 803
Yu, M., Li, Q., Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., & Heim, R. R. (2014) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3701 · Cited by 585
Soil Moisture Drought in China, 1950–2006
Wang, A., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Sheffield, J. (2011) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2011jcli3733.1 · Cited by 512
Zhao, G., Tian, P., Mu, X., Jiao, J., Wang, F., & Gao, P. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.014 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhai, J., Su, B., Krysanova, V., Vetter, T., Gao, C., & Jiang, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 649-663
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2143822331
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Variation and Trends in PDSI and SPI Indices and Their Relation to Streamflow in 10 Large Regions of China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/2009jcli2968.1
- The paper
- Zhai, J., Su, B., Krysanova, V., Vetter, T., Gao, C., & Jiang, T. (2010). Spatial Variation and Trends in PDSI and SPI Indices and Their Relation to Streamflow in 10 Large Regions of China. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2968.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.