The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential Predictability of the Madden–Julian Oscillation
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study is to estimate the limit of dynamical predictability of the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO). Ensembles of “twin” predictability experiments were carried out with the NASA Goddard Laboratory for the Atmospheres (GLA) atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) using specified annual cycle SSTs. Initial conditions were taken from a 10-yr control simulation during periods of strong MJO activity identified via extended empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of 30–90-day bandpassed tropical rainfall. From this analysis, 15 cases were chosen when the MJO convective center was located over the Indian Ocean, Maritime Continent, western Pacific Ocean, and central Pacific Ocean, respectively, making 60 MJO cases in total. In addition, 15 cases were selected that exhibited very little to no MJO activity. Two different sets of small random perturbations were added to these 75 initial states. Simulations were then performed for 90 days from each of these 150 perturbed initial conditions. A measure of potential predictability was constructed based on a ratio of the signal associated with the MJO, in terms of rainfall or 200-hPa velocity potential (VP200), and the mean-square error between sets of twin forecasts. This ratio indicates that useful predictability for this model's MJO extends out to about 25–30 days for VP200 and to about 10–15 days for rainfall. This is in contrast to the timescales of useful predictability associated with persistence forecasts or forecasts associated with daily “weather” variations, which in either case extend out only to about 10–15 days for VP200 and 8–10 days for rainfall. The predictability measure shows modest dependence on the phase of the MJO, with greater predictability for the convective phase at short (< ~5 days) lead times and for the suppressed phase at longer (> ~15 days) lead times. In addition, the predictability of intraseasonal variability during periods of weak MJO activity is significantly diminished compared to periods of strong MJO activity. The implications of these results as well as their associated model and analysis caveats are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model
Lorenz, E. N. (1982) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v34i6.10836 · Cited by 450
Cited by
Zhang, C. (2005) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2004rg000158 · Cited by 2,178
The New GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM2–LM2: Evaluation with Prescribed SST Simulations
(2004) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-3223.1 · Cited by 854
Madden–Julian Oscillation: Bridging Weather and Climate
Zhang, C. (2013) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-12-00026.1 · Cited by 727
Prediction of the Madden–Julian oscillation with the POAMA dynamical prediction system
Rashid, H. A., Hendon, H. H., Wheeler, M. C., & Alves, O. (2011) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0754-x · Cited by 242
Four Theories of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation
Zhang, C., Adames, Á. F., Khouider, B., Wang, B., & Yang, D. (2020) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000685 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Waliser, D. E., Lau, K. M., Stern, W., & Jones, C.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-50
- ISSN
- 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0477
- OpenAlex
- W1974556951
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential Predictability of the Madden–Julian Oscillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/bams-84-1-33
- The paper
- Waliser, D. E., Lau, K. M., Stern, W., & Jones, C. (2003). Potential Predictability of the Madden–Julian Oscillation. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-84-1-33
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.