Cited by 415Climate variability and modelsUrban Heat Island MitigationCalibration and Measurement Techniques

U.S. Climate Reference Network after one decade of operations: Status and assessment

Open access
Diamond, Howard J., Karl, Thomas R., Palecki, Michael A., Baker, C. Bruce, Bell, Jesse E., Leeper, Ronald D., Easterling, David R., Lawrimore, Jay H. +4 more·2013·Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Abstract

The year 2012 marks a decade of observations undertaken by the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) under the auspices of NOAA's National Climatic Data Center and Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division. The network consists of 114 sites across the conterminous 48 states, with additional sites in Alaska and Hawaii. Stations are installed in open (where possible), rural sites very likely to have stable land-cover/use conditions for several decades to come. At each site a suite of meteorological parameters are monitored, including triple redundancy for the primary air temperature and precipitation variables and for soil moisture/temperature. Instrumentation is regularly calibrated to National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) standards and maintained by a staff of expert engineers. This attention to detail in USCRN is intended to ensure the creation of an unimpeachable record of changes in surface climate over the United States for decades to come. Data are made available without restriction for all public, private, and government use. This article describes the rationale for the USCRN, its implementation, and some of the highlights of the first decade of operations. One critical use of these observations is as an independent data source to verify the existing U.S. temperature record derived from networks corrected for nonhomogenous histories. Future directions for the network are also discussed, including the applicability of USCRN approaches for networks monitoring climate at scales from regional to global. Constructive feedback from end users will allow for continued improvement of USCRN in the future and ensure that it continues to meet stakeholder requirements for precise climate measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/bams-d-12-00170.1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PHA has been shown to improve the accuracy of anomalies and trends in real data when compared to observations from the U.S. Climate Reference Network.

    “The algorithm has also been shown to improve the accuracy of anomalies and trends in real data when compared to observations from the U.S. Climate Reference Network (Hausfather et al. 2016), whose stations meet the highest station siting standards and are managed to prevent changes that cause shifts in the data (Diamond et al. 2013).”

    From The Global Historical Climatology Network Monthly Temperature Dataset, Version 4 (2018) · cites this paper as Diamond et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. NRC, 1999: Adequacy of Climate Observing Systems. National Academy Press, 51 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diamond, H. J., Karl, T. R., Palecki, M. A., Baker, C. B., Bell, J. E., Leeper, R. D., Easterling, D. R., Lawrimore, J. H., Meyers, T. P., Helfert, M. R., Goodge, G., & Thorne, P. W.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Diamond, Howard J.
Venue
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
485-498
ISSN
  • 0003-0007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0477
OpenAlex
W2097434015
Cited by
415
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Science
  • Climate Program Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
Keywords
U.S. Climate Reference Network, air temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, soil temperature, instrument calibration, NIST standards, climate data record, long-term climate monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review